[Bug java/12893] New: The included test case does not link

[Bug java/12893] New: The included test case does not link

[oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893

           Summary: The included test case does not link
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

I think it is supposed to link.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-10/msg00304.html

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893



------- Additional Comments From oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com  2003-11-04 08:24 -------
Created an attachment (id=5053)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5053&action=view)
Linking errors

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893


oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dog at bluezoo dot org

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893



------- Additional Comments From oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com  2003-11-04 08:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=5052)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5052&action=view)
Testcase that does not compile when running compile.cmd

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-09 02:34 -------
I had look into the and the problem was that one of the class files calls the super's 
functions and the super class was abstract so it was causing a link problem.  Is there any 
way to get the source to gnu.inet.ftp.* classes, I could not find them any where.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[dog at bluezoo dot org]

------- Additional Comments From dog at bluezoo dot org  2003-11-09 09:25 -------
Subject: Re:  The included test case does not link

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I had look into the and the problem was that one of the class files 
> calls the super's
> functions and the super class was abstract so it was causing a link 
> problem.  Is there any
> way to get the source to gnu.inet.ftp.* classes, I could not find them 
> any where.

from classpath cvs, module inetlib.

thanks for looking into it,


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-09 19:09 -------
The code does excatlly what I said it did.
GCJ should have rejected this code when compiling to *.class like javac does:
D.java:13: abstract method f() cannot be accessed directly
  void f(){super.f();}
                ^
1 error


Simplified version:
class A
{
  void f(){}
}
abstract class B extends A
{
  abstract void f();
}
class C extends B
{
  void f(){super.f();}
}

Can you report my findings to classpath for this module?

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |accepts-invalid
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-11-09 19:09:22
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[dog at bluezoo dot org]

------- Additional Comments From dog at bluezoo dot org  2004-01-08 17:14 -------
(From update of attachment 5435)
I've created a makefile that should be a bit more portable, and attempted to
build using that.
The original error(s) were not specified on the bugzilla issue. make gives me:

/usr/local/bin/gcj -c -o activation.o
--classpath=/usr/local/share/java/libgcj-3.4.jar activation.jar
/var/tmp//cclKloMi.s:23974:FATAL:Symbol
__GLOBAL__I__ZN3gnu10activation16MagicFileTypeMapC1Ev already defined.
make: *** [activation.o] Error 1

I can build javax-security.o and send.o, but the others all give this
already-defined error.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-08 18:17 -------
Note what exact version are you using to get the link errors?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893

[Bug java/12893] The included test case does not link

[tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-09 07:12 -------
I tried this tonight.
I had to edit the Makefile a bit to get things to work.

I see the same errors that Andrew sees in comment #3.
I don't see a duplicate definition.

This PR looks like it might be related to Bug 13273.
How did you generate the .class files in question?
Was it with gcj or some other compiler?

I'm using
gcj (GCC) 3.4.0 20040107 (experimental)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12893