public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/13626] New: [3.4 regression] rejects valid
@ 2004-01-09 10:27 rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-09 10:28 ` [Bug c++/13626] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-01-09 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The attached testcase fails to compile with recent CVS HEAD (g++-3.4 (GCC) 3.4.0
20040107 (experimental)). Works ok with g++ (GCC) 3.4 20031206 (experimental).
--
Summary: [3.4 regression] rejects valid
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13626] [3.4 regression] rejects valid
2004-01-09 10:27 [Bug c++/13626] New: [3.4 regression] rejects valid rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-01-09 10:28 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-09 17:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-01-09 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-01-09 10:28 -------
Created an attachment (id=5439)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5439&action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13626] [3.4 regression] rejects valid
2004-01-09 10:27 [Bug c++/13626] New: [3.4 regression] rejects valid rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-09 10:28 ` [Bug c++/13626] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-01-09 17:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-10 11:18 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-09 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-09 17:12 -------
I think there is a duplicate some where but I have to use lynx so I cannot find it right now.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13626] [3.4 regression] rejects valid
2004-01-09 10:27 [Bug c++/13626] New: [3.4 regression] rejects valid rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-09 10:28 ` [Bug c++/13626] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-09 17:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-10 11:18 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-10 12:56 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-10 14:44 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-01-10 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-01-10 11:18 -------
Richard,
the code looks invalid to me. In the member initializer list of the copy
construct you have:
face_m(model.face)
with:
int face_m;
int face() const { return face_m; }
So, it looks like that you actually wanted to say face_m(model.face()) or face_m
(model.face_m). GCC is right.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13626] [3.4 regression] rejects valid
2004-01-09 10:27 [Bug c++/13626] New: [3.4 regression] rejects valid rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-10 11:18 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
@ 2004-01-10 12:56 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-10 14:44 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de @ 2004-01-10 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-01-10 12:55 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] rejects valid
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-01-10 11:18 -------
> Richard,
>
> the code looks invalid to me. In the member initializer list of the copy
> construct you have:
>
> face_m(model.face)
>
> with:
>
> int face_m;
> int face() const { return face_m; }
>
> So, it looks like that you actually wanted to say face_m(model.face()) or face_m
> (model.face_m). GCC is right.
Doh, you are right. Odd, previous gcc 3.4 accepted it, as still does
current gcc 3.3 and even Intel icpc in -ansi mode...
Can you change the bug to say accepts-invalid for 3.3 then?
Thanks,
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/13626] [3.4 regression] rejects valid
2004-01-09 10:27 [Bug c++/13626] New: [3.4 regression] rejects valid rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-01-10 12:56 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
@ 2004-01-10 14:44 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: giovannibajo at libero dot it @ 2004-01-10 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-01-10 14:44 -------
Richard, there is no point in reopening the bug, because it is not a
regression. GCC always accepted the invalid code and this bug was fixed in
3.4.0. We keep around 3.3 bugs only if they are regressions from previous
versions.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |giovannibajo at libero dot
| |it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-10 14:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-09 10:27 [Bug c++/13626] New: [3.4 regression] rejects valid rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-09 10:28 ` [Bug c++/13626] " rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-09 17:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-10 11:18 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-01-10 12:56 ` rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de
2004-01-10 14:44 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).