public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/13879] New: Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class
@ 2004-01-27  9:31 lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
  2004-01-27 15:35 ` [Bug c++/13879] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il @ 2004-01-27  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

code is (in file fact.cc):
// meta factorial - example for generative programming by James O. Coplien
// the Test class was added to demonstrate the gcc compilation error.

#include <stdio.h>

class Test {
public:
  template<int n>
  struct Fact 
  {
    enum {RET = Fact<n-1>::RET*n};
  };
  
  template<>
  struct Fact<0>
  {
    enum{RET = 1};
  };

  void Print()
  {
    printf("Fact<7>=%d\n", Fact<7>::RET);
  }
};

int main()
{
  Test t;
  
  t.Print();
  return 0;
} 

command line:
gcc fact.cc

compilation error:
fact.cc:14: explicit specialization in non-namespace scope 'Test'

Note: the same code was compiled using sun compiler:
cc fact.cc
Both compilation and execution were successful.

-- 
           Summary: Error when doing an explicit specilization within a
                    class
           Product: gcc
           Version: 2.95.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: sparc-ultra5_10-sunOS5.8
  GCC host triplet: sparc-ultra5_10-sunOS5.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-ultra5_10-sunOS5.8


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13879


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13879] Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class
  2004-01-27  9:31 [Bug c++/13879] New: Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
@ 2004-01-27 15:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-28  5:58 ` lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
  2004-01-28  6:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-27 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-27 15:35 -------
Not a bug, the error message is correct.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13879


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13879] Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class
  2004-01-27  9:31 [Bug c++/13879] New: Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
  2004-01-27 15:35 ` [Bug c++/13879] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-01-28  5:58 ` lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
  2004-01-28  6:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il @ 2004-01-28  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il  2004-01-28 05:58 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Not a bug, the error message is correct.
Is there a compilation flag that can help me compile it (without removing the 
class)?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13879


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/13879] Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class
  2004-01-27  9:31 [Bug c++/13879] New: Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
  2004-01-27 15:35 ` [Bug c++/13879] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-01-28  5:58 ` lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
@ 2004-01-28  6:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-28  6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-01-28 06:05 -------
Do this instead:
#include <stdio.h>



class Test {
public:
  template<const int n>
  struct Fact;
  void Print();
};


template<const int n>
struct Test::Fact
{
  enum {RET = Fact<n-1>::RET*n};
};

  
template<>
struct Test::Fact<0>
{
  enum{RET = 1};
};


void Test::Print()
{
  printf("Fact<7>=%d\n", Fact<7>::RET);
}

int main()
{
  Test t;
  
  t.Print();
  return 0;
} 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13879


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-28  6:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-27  9:31 [Bug c++/13879] New: Error when doing an explicit specilization within a class lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
2004-01-27 15:35 ` [Bug c++/13879] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-01-28  5:58 ` lifshitz at post dot tau dot ac dot il
2004-01-28  6:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).