public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
To: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug tree-optimization/103195] [12 Regression] tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast since r12-5113-gd70ef65692fced7a
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:31:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YebPU9Jn0qXmW1vb@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103195-4-CEpgVBSDzg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
> So nothing to see? I guess our unit growth limit doesn't trigger because it's
> a small (benchmark) unit?
Yep, unit growths do not apply for very small units. ipa-cp heuristics
still IMO needs work and be based on relative speedups rather then
absolute for the cutoffs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-11 17:44 [Bug tree-optimization/103195] New: tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast between g:52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230...a97fdde627e64202940112009d45d17f85e4cc61 hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 7:39 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103195] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 10:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103195] [12 Regression] tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast since r12-5113-gd70ef65692fced7a marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 10:27 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2021-11-12 21:25 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-16 13:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 14:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-18 14:31 ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2022-01-18 14:31 ` hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz
2022-02-17 22:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 8:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/103195] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-26 13:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YebPU9Jn0qXmW1vb@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
--to=hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).