public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend
@ 2021-04-29 19:36 mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-29 19:37 ` [Bug c++/100339] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-29 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100339

            Bug ID: 100339
           Summary: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with
                    friend
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

template<typename T>
void fn (T);

class C {
  friend void ::fn(int);
  friend void ::fn<>(double);
  friend void ::fn<double *>(double *);
};

gives:

$ ./cc1plus -quiet q.C
q.C:5:23: error: ‘void fn(int)’ should have been declared inside ‘::’
    5 |   friend void ::fn(int);
      |                       ^

but ::fn(int) should refer to an instantiation of fn.

Started with r249385.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/100339] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend
  2021-04-29 19:36 [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-29 19:37 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-14  9:54 ` [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-29 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100339

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
            Summary|Bogus "should have been     |[8/9/10/11/12 Regression]
                   |declared inside" error with |Bogus "should have been
                   |friend                      |declared inside" error with
                   |                            |friend
           Priority|P3                          |P2
   Target Milestone|---                         |8.5

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend
  2021-04-29 19:36 [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-29 19:37 ` [Bug c++/100339] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14  9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-06-01  8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14  9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100339

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|8.5                         |9.4

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend
  2021-04-29 19:36 [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-04-29 19:37 ` [Bug c++/100339] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-05-14  9:54 ` [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01  8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-13 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01  8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100339

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|9.4                         |9.5

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend
  2021-04-29 19:36 [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-06-01  8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-13 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-13 16:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-13 16:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-13 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100339

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|                            |8.1.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-12-13
      Known to work|                            |4.1.2, 5.1.0, 7.1.0, 7.5.0

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
ICC warns but still accepts it:
<source>(5): warning #1098: the qualifier on this friend declaration is ignored
    friend void ::fn(int);
                ^

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend
  2021-04-29 19:36 [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-12-13 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-13 16:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-13 16:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-13 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100339

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |barry.revzin at gmail dot com

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 91618 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend
  2021-04-29 19:36 [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-12-13 16:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-13 16:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-13 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100339

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 91618.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 91618 ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-13 16:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-29 19:36 [Bug c++/100339] New: Bogus "should have been declared inside" error with friend mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-29 19:37 ` [Bug c++/100339] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14  9:54 ` [Bug c++/100339] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01  8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 15:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 16:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 16:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).