public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/100366] spurious warning - std::vector::clear followed by std::vector::insert(vec.end(), ...) with -O2 Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 23:44:27 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-100366-4-EsgnNksn96@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-100366-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100366 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Just to clarify: when I said the warning is justified I meant that there is nothing in the IL to keep the warning from triggering. I.e., it works as designed. The problem may be solved by optimizing the code better, which might be possible by enhancing the optimizers or by changing or annotating the libstdc++ code to enable existing optimizations. In the latter case it will of course only help libstdc++ and not other code like it. A third possibility is to make the warning itself smarter than the optimizer and figure out the code is unreachable without its help.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 23:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-01 2:36 [Bug c++/100366] New: " mrsam@courier-mta.com 2021-05-02 11:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100366] " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-03 17:51 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-03 21:02 ` mrsam@courier-mta.com 2021-05-04 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 10:55 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 11:01 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 11:15 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-05-05 12:18 ` mrsam@courier-mta.com 2021-05-12 23:44 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-12-02 21:14 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-06 16:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100366] [11/12 Regression] " roystgnr at ices dot utexas.edu 2021-12-28 12:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-20 14:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-21 7:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-05 10:07 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100366] [11/12/13 " hewillk at gmail dot com 2022-11-26 15:53 ` zeranoe at gmail dot com 2022-11-29 15:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-29 17:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-20 13:57 ` [Bug tree-optimization/100366] [11/12 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-29 10:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-100366-4-EsgnNksn96@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).