public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/100799] Stackoverflow in optimized code on PPC
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 19:08:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100799-4-6zZqfUl8EC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799

Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-06-01

--- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Alexander Grund from comment #1)
> Confirmed to also break with GCC 7.3, 8.2, 8.3 but works with 6.3, 6.4, 6.5

The failure with GCC 7 and later coincides with the PPC port starting to
default to LRA instead of reload.  If I look at the debug dumps compiling
dgebal.f, the 440 offset to the stack is created by an LRA spill.  No problem
there that I can see.  The problem seems to come later when we generate the
prologue/epilogue and we only update the stack pointer by the smaller 368 byte
offset.

Either LRA isn't telling us it needs that extra stack space or the ppc backend
didn't notice.  I'll keep digging.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-01 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-27 11:20 [Bug fortran/100799] New: " alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2021-05-28 16:42 ` [Bug target/100799] " alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2021-06-01 19:08 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-06-01 21:09 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-02  0:31 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2021-10-05 22:45 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-09 11:13 ` kenneth.hoste at ugent dot be
2022-07-08 10:53 ` alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2022-07-08 16:38 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-14 20:10 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-20 11:45 ` alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2022-07-20 14:14 ` alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2022-07-20 17:42 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-20 17:59 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-13 19:29 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-19  5:46 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20 22:45 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17  8:17 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17  9:42 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 17:10 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-31  3:00 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 16:43 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-19 20:25 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21  7:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22  2:51 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 14:44 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 14:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-25  0:39 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-26  9:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27  0:45 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27  7:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 15:30 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-01 15:25 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  7:44 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  7:45 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100799-4-6zZqfUl8EC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).