public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/100799] Stackoverflow in optimized code on PPC
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 14:59:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-100799-4-YGRkbEiWyQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-100799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100799

--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #25)
> CCing Mike and David for possible comments about the possible workarounds
> mentioned in Comment 23 and Comment 24.

Doing the workaround on the caller side is impossible, this is for calls from
C/C++ to Fortran code, directly or indirectly called and there is nothing the
compiler could use to guess that it actually calls Fortran code with hidden
Fortran character arguments.
But I still think the workaround is possible on the callee side.
Sure, if the DECL_HIDDEN_STRING_LENGTH argument(s) is(are) used in the
function, then there is no easy way but expect the parameter save area (ok,
sure, it could just load from the assumed parameter location and don't assume
the rest is there, nor allow storing to the slots it loaded them from).
But that is actually not what BLAS etc. suffers from.
If you have something like
subroutine foo (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h)
  character a
  integer b, c, d, e, f, g, h
  call bar (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h)
end subroutine foo
then the DECL_HIDDEN_STRING_LENGTH argument isn't used at all, on the callee
side the user said that one should treat it as if the length of a is 1, so
whatever the caller passes is unimportant and when passing to further calls it
will just use 1:
void foo (character(kind=1)[1:1] & restrict a, integer(kind=4) & restrict b,
integer(kind=4) & restrict c, integer(kind=4) & restrict d, integer(kind=4) &
restrict e, integer(kind=4) & restrict f, integer(kind=4) & restrict g,
integer(kind=4) & restrict h, integer(kind=8) _a)
{
  <bb 2> :
  bar (a_2(D), b_3(D), c_4(D), d_5(D), e_6(D), f_7(D), g_8(D), h_9(D), 1);
  return;

}
It would seem that the _a argument is useless, but as explained in PR90329 that
is because in Fortran you can call foo ("foo", 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) without
interfaces etc.
and the first argument could be character, character(len=1), character(len=3)
or character(len=*) etc.  And only in the last case the argument is actually
needed, in other cases it is ignored.

So, the workaround could be for the case of unused DECL_HIDDEN_STRING_LENGTH
arguments at the end of PARM_DECLs don't try to load those at all and don't
assume there is parameter save area unless the non-DECL_HIDDEN_STRING_LENGTH or
used DECL_HIDDEN_STRING_LENGTH arguments actually require it.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-27 11:20 [Bug fortran/100799] New: " alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2021-05-28 16:42 ` [Bug target/100799] " alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2021-06-01 19:08 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 21:09 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-02  0:31 ` amodra at gmail dot com
2021-10-05 22:45 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-09 11:13 ` kenneth.hoste at ugent dot be
2022-07-08 10:53 ` alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2022-07-08 16:38 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-14 20:10 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-20 11:45 ` alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2022-07-20 14:14 ` alexander.grund@tu-dresden.de
2022-07-20 17:42 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-20 17:59 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-13 19:29 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-19  5:46 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-20 22:45 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17  8:17 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17  9:42 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 17:10 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-31  3:00 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-09 16:43 ` jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-19 20:25 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-21  7:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22  2:51 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 14:44 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-22 14:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-02-25  0:39 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-26  9:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27  0:45 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27  7:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-27 15:30 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-01 15:25 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  7:44 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-22  7:45 ` aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-100799-4-YGRkbEiWyQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).