public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/101088] New: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
@ 2021-06-16 3:10 asolokha at gmx dot com
2021-06-16 6:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101088] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2021-06-16 3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
Bug ID: 101088
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at
tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 51026
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51026&action=edit
Testcase
gcc-12.0.0-alpha20210613 snapshot (g:681143b9b94d7f1c88a7c34e2250865c31191959)
ICEs when compiling the attached testcase w/ -O1:
% gcc-12.0.0 -O1 -c eltbeodv.c
during GIMPLE pass: lim
eltbeodv.c: In function 'qw':
eltbeodv.c:4:1: internal compiler error: in sm_seq_valid_bb, at
tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
4 | qw (int n2)
| ^~
0x7048b8 sm_seq_valid_bb
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-12.0.0_alpha20210613/work/gcc-12-20210613/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
0xf652cd hoist_memory_references
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-12.0.0_alpha20210613/work/gcc-12-20210613/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2538
0xf66e0a store_motion_loop
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-12.0.0_alpha20210613/work/gcc-12-20210613/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2925
0xf69092 do_store_motion
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-12.0.0_alpha20210613/work/gcc-12-20210613/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2945
0xf69092 loop_invariant_motion_in_fun(function*, bool)
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-12.0.0_alpha20210613/work/gcc-12-20210613/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:3170
0xf695e9 execute
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-12.0.0_alpha20210613/work/gcc-12-20210613/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-im.c:3231
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
2021-06-16 3:10 [Bug tree-optimization/101088] New: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383 asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2021-06-16 6:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-16 8:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-16 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2021-06-16
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
2021-06-16 3:10 [Bug tree-optimization/101088] New: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383 asolokha at gmx dot com
2021-06-16 6:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101088] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-16 8:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-16 10:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-16 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Just for the record, started with r12-1392-gb8b80b8aa3d9a7ab.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
2021-06-16 3:10 [Bug tree-optimization/101088] New: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383 asolokha at gmx dot com
2021-06-16 6:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101088] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-16 8:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-16 10:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-16 10:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-07 14:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-16 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986
commit r12-1526-g43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Wed Jun 16 09:49:18 2021 +0200
tree-optimization/101088 - fix SM invalidation issue
When we face a sm_ord vs sm_unord for the same ref during
store sequence merging we assert that the ref is already marked
unsupported. But it can be that it will only be marked so
during the ongoing merging so instead of asserting mark it here.
Also apply some optimization to not waste resources to search
for already unsupported refs.
2021-06-16 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/101088
* tree-ssa-loop-im.c (sm_seq_valid_bb): Only look for
supported refs on edges. Do not assert same ref but
different kind stores are unsuported but mark them so.
(hoist_memory_references): Only look for supported refs
on exits.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr101088.c: New testcase.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
2021-06-16 3:10 [Bug tree-optimization/101088] New: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383 asolokha at gmx dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-16 10:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-16 10:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-07 14:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-16 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |101025
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
[Bug 101025] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/101088] [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
2021-06-16 3:10 [Bug tree-optimization/101088] New: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383 asolokha at gmx dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-16 10:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-07 14:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-07 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
<rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91fc9610464281bb28e3c6529399fdcfb57fa812
commit r11-8696-g91fc9610464281bb28e3c6529399fdcfb57fa812
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Wed Jun 16 09:49:18 2021 +0200
tree-optimization/101088 - fix SM invalidation issue
When we face a sm_ord vs sm_unord for the same ref during
store sequence merging we assert that the ref is already marked
unsupported. But it can be that it will only be marked so
during the ongoing merging so instead of asserting mark it here.
Also apply some optimization to not waste resources to search
for already unsupported refs.
2021-06-16 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/101088
* tree-ssa-loop-im.c (sm_seq_valid_bb): Only look for
supported refs on edges. Do not assert same ref but
different kind stores are unsuported but mark them so.
(hoist_memory_references): Only look for supported refs
on exits.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr101088.c: New testcase.
(cherry picked from commit 43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-07 14:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-16 3:10 [Bug tree-optimization/101088] New: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383 asolokha at gmx dot com
2021-06-16 6:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101088] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-16 8:57 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-16 10:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-16 10:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-07 14:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).