public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/101090] New: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values
@ 2021-06-16 10:27 vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2021-06-16 13:10 ` [Bug c/101090] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net @ 2021-06-16 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101090
Bug ID: 101090
Summary: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with
constant values
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
Target Milestone: ---
When remquo is used with constant values, GCC emits the following warning:
warning: right-hand operand of comma expression has no effect [-Wunused-value]
According to the following testcase compiled with the "-Wunused-value -c"
options, the warning is obtained only for f2, i.e. is does not occur when the
function is not called remquo or when non-constant values are used.
double r (double, double, int *);
double remquo (double, double, int *);
int f1 (void)
{
int quo;
r (1.0, 3.0, &quo);
return quo;
}
int f2 (void)
{
int quo;
remquo (1.0, 3.0, &quo);
return quo;
}
int f3 (double x, double y)
{
int quo;
remquo (x, y, &quo);
return quo;
}
Testcase also available on https://godbolt.org/z/Px44sxn4h for testing, where I
can see that this bug was introduced in GCC 9.1.0 and is still present in the
trunk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/101090] incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values
2021-06-16 10:27 [Bug c/101090] New: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
@ 2021-06-16 13:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 9:53 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-16 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101090
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Last reconfirmed| |2021-06-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We warn about
(gdb) p expr
$2 = <compound_expr 0x7ffff669cbb8>
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (expr)
quo = 0;, 1.0e+0
which is folded from the call via do_mpfr_remquo:
/* Dereference the quo pointer argument. */
arg_quo = build_fold_indirect_ref (arg_quo);
/* Proceed iff a valid pointer type was passed in. */
if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (arg_quo)) == integer_type_node)
{
/* Set the value. */
tree result_quo
= fold_build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (arg_quo), arg_quo,
build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (arg_quo),
integer_quo));
TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (result_quo) = 1;
/* Combine the quo assignment with the rem. */
result = non_lvalue (fold_build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, type,
result_quo, result_rem));
but we should probably set TREE_NO_WARNING on the COMPOUND_EXPR.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/101090] incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values
2021-06-16 10:27 [Bug c/101090] New: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2021-06-16 13:10 ` [Bug c/101090] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-18 9:53 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2023-07-18 10:09 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2023-07-18 12:42 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net @ 2023-07-18 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101090
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> ---
On Debian, I get a warning from GCC 9 to GCC 12 (Debian 12.3.0-6), but neither
with GCC 13 (Debian 13.1.0-8) nor with 14.0.0 20230612 (Debian 20230613-1).
So, has this bug been fixed (and where)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/101090] incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values
2021-06-16 10:27 [Bug c/101090] New: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2021-06-16 13:10 ` [Bug c/101090] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 9:53 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
@ 2023-07-18 10:09 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2023-07-18 12:42 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net @ 2023-07-18 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101090
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> ---
(In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #2)
> So, has this bug been fixed (and where)?
This seems to be a particular case of PR106264, which was fixed in commit
r13-1741-g40f6e5912288256ee8ac41474f2dce7b6881c111.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/101090] incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values
2021-06-16 10:27 [Bug c/101090] New: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-07-18 10:09 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
@ 2023-07-18 12:42 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com @ 2023-07-18 12:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101090
Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC| |roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> ---
Many thanks to Vincent for spotting/confirming that his bug report is a
duplicate of PR 106264, which was fixed in GCC 13.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 106264 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-18 12:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-16 10:27 [Bug c/101090] New: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with constant values vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2021-06-16 13:10 ` [Bug c/101090] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 9:53 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2023-07-18 10:09 ` vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
2023-07-18 12:42 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).