public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/101591] New: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple
@ 2021-07-23  4:02 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-23  4:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101591] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-23  4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101591

            Bug ID: 101591
           Summary: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Take:
bool f(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
    return (a|b) == a;
}

This should be optimized to:
bool f(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
    return (b & ~a) ==/!= 0;
}

It might be only best if you we do for constant b's though.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/101591] (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple
  2021-07-23  4:02 [Bug tree-optimization/101591] New: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-23  4:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-23  4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-23  4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101591

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I noticed this while working on PR96779

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/101591] (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple
  2021-07-23  4:02 [Bug tree-optimization/101591] New: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-23  4:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101591] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-23  4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-23  4:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-23  4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101591

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
           Keywords|                            |easyhack
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-07-23

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine, something like:
(for cmp (eq ne)
 (simplify
  (cmp:c (bit_ior @0 INTEGER_CST@1) @0)
  (cmp:c (bit_and @1 (bit_not @0)) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE(@0)); })))

Note

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/101591] (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple
  2021-07-23  4:02 [Bug tree-optimization/101591] New: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-23  4:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101591] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-23  4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-23  4:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-27 10:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-27 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-23  4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101591

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Mine, something like:
> (for cmp (eq ne)
>  (simplify
>   (cmp:c (bit_ior @0 INTEGER_CST@1) @0)
>   (cmp:c (bit_and @1 (bit_not @0)) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE(@0)); })))
> 
> Note

maybe a power of 2 integer constant might be better because is just a shift and
an and in the end.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/101591] (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple
  2021-07-23  4:02 [Bug tree-optimization/101591] New: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-07-23  4:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-27 10:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-07-27 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-27 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101591

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Not sure if it is cheaper - it's one more operation on GIMPLE so (a|b) == a
looks more canonical?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/101591] (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple
  2021-07-23  4:02 [Bug tree-optimization/101591] New: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-07-27 10:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-07-27 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-27 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101591

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Not sure if it is cheaper - it's one more operation on GIMPLE so (a|b) == a
> looks more canonical?

I agree.
I filed the constant one as PR 101650 after not realizing I filed this one
already too :).

So this is a dup of bug 101650 really :).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101650 ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-27 20:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-23  4:02 [Bug tree-optimization/101591] New: (a|b) ==/!= a -> (b & ~a) ==/!= 0 on gimple pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-23  4:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/101591] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-23  4:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-23  4:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 10:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-07-27 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).