[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[jay.foad at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jay.foad at gmail dot com

--- Comment #16 from Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail dot com> 2011-05-24 09:17:21 UTC ---
> This is almost the same as the case discussed in DR 141.
> 
> In particular, we must determine whether "node.foo <" is the start of a
> template, or not.  [basic.lookup.classref] says that we look in the class of the
> object expression, i.e., X<T>::node.  However, that's a dependent type.  So, we
> don't actually try to lookup there.  Thus, we then go on to do lookup in the
> scope of the containing postfix-expression, which finds the global template
> function.  DR 141 suggests that we should not do the second lookup.  However,
> this DR is still in the "open" state; the committee has taken no action as of yet.

DR 141 was resolved in CD1:

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#141

It seems like we should still do the second lookup.

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[bangerth at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bangerth at gmail dot com

--- Comment #17 from Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at gmail dot com> 2011-10-09 13:34:27 UTC ---
Still happens with gcc 4.5.1.

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[manu at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #18 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-19 22:29:28 UTC ---
This still happens in trunk (GCC 4.7 rev 180166).

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |timon.gehr at gmx dot ch

--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-23 18:56:42 UTC ---
*** Bug 51664 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[eatmyshortz at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Matt Giuca <eatmyshortz at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |eatmyshortz at gmail dot
                   |                            |com

--- Comment #20 from Matt Giuca <eatmyshortz at gmail dot com> 2012-05-30 00:05:47 UTC ---
I think this is the same bug in Clang:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11856
It was fixed in March:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=152520

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #21 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-08-23 10:14:16 UTC ---
Jason, noticed this very, very old issue which however clang too fixed only
this March. Wondered if you have tips, believe it would be easy to fix in our
front-end too, what else...

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |walter.mascarenhas at gmail
                   |                            |dot com

--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2013-03-04 10:09:01 UTC ---
*** Bug 56516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org        |
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
Mine.

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tomalk at mathematik dot uni-freib
                   |                            |urg.de

--- Comment #24 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 63414 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[colin.mackenzie at ineoquest dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Colin MacKenzie <colin.mackenzie at ineoquest dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |colin.mackenzie at ineoquest dot c
                   |                            |om

--- Comment #26 from Colin MacKenzie <colin.mackenzie at ineoquest dot com> ---
Had this one today. Strange that it compiles fine in 4.4.6 but not in 4.8.2.

error: parse error in template argument list
Ex: assert(block.begin < block.end);

works when I parenthesize the block.begin
Ex. assert( (block.begin) < block.end);

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
           Assignee|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com    |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #27 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
This should be fixed ASAP, but I'm not actively working on it at the moment.

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-09 18:16 -------
*** Bug 39407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot
                   |                            |com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-20 02:56 -------
*** Bug 20308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |igodard at pacbell dot net


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-19 23:10 -------
*** Bug 32408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |chsalvia at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-04-05 06:03 -------
This is almost the same as the case discussed in DR 141.

In particular, we must determine whether "node.foo <" is the start of a
template, or not.  [basic.lookup.classref] says that we look in the class of the
object expression, i.e., X<T>::node.  However, that's a dependent type.  So, we
don't actually try to lookup there.  Thus, we then go on to do lookup in the
scope of the containing postfix-expression, which finds the global template
function.  DR 141 suggests that we should not do the second lookup.  However,
this DR is still in the "open" state; the committee has taken no action as of yet.

However, independently of that, [temp.names] says that when the object has a
dependent type (as it does in this case), then the name is a template only if
the template keyword is explicitly used.  So, the compiler is definitely wrong
in this case.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |mark at codesourcery dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-13 14:50 -------
It's parser bug.  Not working on it anymore.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |org                         |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-04 06:12 -------
It is even worse now on the mainline:
pr10200.cc: In member function `bool X<T>::bar()':
pr10200.cc:8: error: missing `>' to terminate the template argument list
pr10200.cc: In member function `bool X<T>::bar() [with T = int]':
pr10200.cc:11:   instantiated from here
pr10200.cc:8: error: `foo' is not a member template function

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2004-05-05 03:49:04         |2004-08-04 06:12:28
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-12-17 17:05 -------
Since this is no longer a regression, I've removed the 3.4 target milestone.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|3.4                         |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-23 11:54 -------
It's no longer a regression.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[3.4 Regression] Weird clash|Weird clash with same names
                   |with same names in different|in different scopes
                   |scopes                      |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200



------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-08-08 00:07 -------
Maybe related to PR 11814.

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at physics dot uc
                   |                            |dot edu
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
   Last reconfirmed|2003-06-07 16:43:06         |2003-07-17 00:10:59
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-07-17 00:10 -------
With the small testcase, we now ICE on the mainline (20030716):
pr10200.cc: In member function `bool X<T>::bar() [with T = int]':
pr10200.cc:12:   instantiated from here
pr10200.cc:9: internal compiler error: in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1219
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

[pinskia@physics.uc.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-06-07 16:43:06
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-06-07 16:43 -------
Still happens on the mainline (20030607).