public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 20:53:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102043-4-NMaTOGhncT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102043-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
--- Comment #45 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin <mikael@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e72fbb6915c1dd1a52ecef55e10329e353cc3072
commit r12-8228-ge72fbb6915c1dd1a52ecef55e10329e353cc3072
Author: Mikael Morin <mikael@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri Apr 22 22:52:26 2022 +0200
fortran: Update index extraction code. [PR102043]
This avoids a regression on hollerith4.f90 and hollerith6.f90 later in
the patch series when code generation for array references is changed
to use pointer arithmetic.
The problem comes from the extraction of the array index from an
ARRAY_REF tree, which doesnât work if the tree is not an ARRAY_REF
any more.
This updates the code generated for remaining size evaluation to work
with a source tree that uses either array indexing or pointer
arithmetic.
PR fortran/102043
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* trans-io.cc: Add handling for the case where the array
is referenced using pointer arithmetic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-24 14:18 [Bug fortran/102043] New: Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-25 8:42 ` [Bug fortran/102043] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-25 9:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-25 10:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-25 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-25 10:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-30 19:56 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-08 21:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-10 16:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-10 17:12 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-11 8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 18:14 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-12 19:30 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 7:57 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 9:33 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 9:38 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 16:07 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 16:18 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 17:00 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 17:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-14 19:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-15 10:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-19 18:21 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-19 18:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-22 7:46 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2021-11-22 22:33 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-27 21:43 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-11 17:47 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-11 17:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-12 17:04 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-12 21:26 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 9:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-03 9:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-24 9:39 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-24 16:40 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-27 19:36 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-28 6:36 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-03-28 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-28 12:24 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 6:45 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 6:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-03-30 9:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 11:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-05 10:21 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-25 6:07 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-27 9:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:46 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-28 10:36 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-28 10:37 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:40 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-102043-4-NMaTOGhncT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).