public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:22:35 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102043-4-s2Co5C692E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102043-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043 --- Comment #42 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 52717 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52717&action=edit hack to rewrite all ARRA_REFs This shows a simple hack emitting *(&array + offset) from gfc_build_array_ref. That covers too many cases (as said, covering cases from array descriptor accesses should be enough). Appended is also testresults which show besides a large number of original tree dump scanning fails a few execute FAILs and a few ICEs where the gfortran frontend doesn't expect anything but an ARRAY_REF to be fed into select places (some already deal with an INDIRECT_REF as I found out). One such place is gfc_convert_array_to_string. As said, all this is probably backwards as to what the OpenACC folks desire.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-30 11:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-24 14:18 [Bug fortran/102043] New: Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 8:42 ` [Bug fortran/102043] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 9:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 10:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 10:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 10:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-30 19:56 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-08 21:23 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-10 16:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-10 17:12 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-11 8:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 18:14 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-12 19:30 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 7:57 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 9:33 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 9:38 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 16:07 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 16:18 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 17:00 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 17:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-14 19:42 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-15 10:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-19 18:21 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-19 18:31 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-22 7:46 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2021-11-22 22:33 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-27 21:43 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-11 17:47 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-11 17:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-12 17:04 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-12 21:26 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-03 9:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-03 9:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-24 9:39 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Wrong array types used for negative stride accesses, gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 FAILs rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-24 16:40 ` tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-27 19:36 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-28 6:36 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2022-03-28 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-28 12:24 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-30 6:45 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-30 6:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2022-03-30 9:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-30 11:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-04-05 10:21 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-22 20:53 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-25 6:07 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [9/10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-27 9:36 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:46 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-28 10:36 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-28 10:37 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:40 ` [Bug fortran/102043] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102043-4-s2Co5C692E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).