public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/102059] Incorrect always_inline diagnostic in LTO mode with #pragma GCC target("cpu=power10") Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 06:26:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102059-4-8Ntb5XanE9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059 --- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- One more reduced test case: fail cmd: gcc -c -O2 -flto -mcpu=power8 pass cmd: gcc -c -O2 -flto -mcpu=power8 -mno-htm -mno-power8-fusion ---------------------- __attribute__((always_inline)) int foo(int *b) { *b += 10; return *b; } #pragma GCC target "cpu=power10" int bar(int* a){ *a = foo(a); return 0; } ---------------------- I confirm the mismatch subset on HTM is expected, ISA 3.1 has removed the transnational memory support. As to OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION, it's reasonable to exclude it from ISA3.0 (power9), but I'm not sure if it's not a subset of Power10 new fusion, from the current implementation it isn't. Hi @Mike, could you help to confirm this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 6:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-08-25 9:42 [Bug lto/102059] New: " fw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 9:49 ` [Bug ipa/102059] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 9:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 11:49 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com 2021-08-25 13:25 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 13:30 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 13:34 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 13:44 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-25 15:34 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 6:26 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-08-26 8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 8:34 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 8:45 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 8:56 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 9:02 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 9:04 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 9:29 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 9:34 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-08-26 18:46 ` meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-01 7:10 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-14 14:09 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com 2021-09-14 14:11 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com 2021-09-15 9:57 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-09-15 12:19 ` chip.kerchner at ibm dot com 2021-11-26 2:07 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-05 3:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 18:55 ` pc at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-04 19:33 ` dan at danny dot cz 2022-02-04 20:15 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-05 2:50 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-08 21:53 ` meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-09 2:33 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-09 3:20 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-09 7:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-02-09 7:35 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-15 6:38 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-05 18:14 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 16:41 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 19:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 21:45 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-19 21:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-19 21:25 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102059-4-8Ntb5XanE9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).