* [Bug tree-optimization/102446] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
@ 2021-09-22 10:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 10:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2021-09-22
Keywords| |wrong-code
Version|unknown |12.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. Happens with -O3 -fno-inline as well, -fdisable-tree-cunroll "fixes
it", not further investigated.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
2021-09-22 10:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102446] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 10:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 10:56 ` Jan Hubicka
2021-09-22 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 1 reply; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|wrong code at -O3 on |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
|x86_64-linux-gnu |wrong code at -O3 on
| |x86_64-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r5-6477-g3620b606822f80863488ca4883542d848d41f9f9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
2021-09-22 10:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102446] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 10:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 10:56 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
` (15 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
void m() {
int aa = 0, i = 0;
for (; i < 3; i++)
if (k < 0)
aa |= *j;
Dump of assembler code for function m:
0x0000000000400540 <+0>: mov 0x200b16(%rip),%edi # 0x60105c
<k>
0x0000000000400546 <+6>: mov 0x200b13(%rip),%rax # 0x601060
<j>
0x000000000040054d <+13>: sar $0x1f,%edi
=> 0x0000000000400550 <+16>: and (%rax),%edi
0x0000000000400552 <+18>: cmpw $0x0,0x200af6(%rip) # 0x601050
<d>
so we're loading *j before checking k < 0. On GIMPLE that's OK:
<bb 2> [local count: 268435456]:
k.5_1 = k;
j.6_2 = j;
if (k.5_1 < 0)
goto <bb 3>; [41.00%]
else
goto <bb 4>; [59.00%]
<bb 3> [local count: 110058537]:
j.6__lsm0.31_28 = *j.6_2;
<bb 4> [local count: 268435456]:
# aa_9 = PHI <j.6__lsm0.31_28(3), 0(2)>
but RTL if-conversion makes the load unconditional.
(insn 13 12 35 3 (set (reg/v:SI 89 [ j.6__lsm0.31 ])
(mem:SI (reg/f:DI 83 [ j.6_2 ]) [1 *j.6_2+0 S4 A32])) 77
{*movsi_internal}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/f:DI 83 [ j.6_2 ])
(nil)))
I don't see any flags marking it as not trapping?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 10:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 10:56 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2021-09-22 10:57 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at ucw dot cz @ 2021-09-22 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> Started with r5-6477-g3620b606822f80863488ca4883542d848d41f9f9
This only affects early inlining decisions, so it may be useful to
bisect this with --param early-inlining-insns=14
Honza
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 10:56 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
@ 2021-09-22 10:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 10:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 10:57 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 10:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 11:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
> > Started with r5-6477-g3620b606822f80863488ca4883542d848d41f9f9
> This only affects early inlining decisions, so it may be useful to
> bisect this with --param early-inlining-insns=14
>
> Honza
It's also miscompiled with -fno-inline.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 10:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 11:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
int a = 1, c, e, f, *j, k, o, *r = &f, s;
char b, l;
short d, *g;
unsigned h;
static void m(void);
static inline void n(int);
void p(int *q) {
while (1) {
if (*q)
break;
if (*g)
o = c;
while (l)
;
}
}
void t() {
for (; s < 8; s++)
m();
}
__attribute__((noinline)) void m() {
int aa = 0, i = 0;
for (; i < 3; i++)
if (k < 0)
aa |= *j;
if (d)
c = (h + *g + 2) & c;
n(aa);
}
static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) void n(int ac) {
char *ad = &b, u = ac, *v = &b;
int ae = *ad = a;
u && (*v = e > 0);
*r = c;
p(&ae);
}
int main() {
t();
return 0;
}
ICEs already in r105000.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 11:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 11:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I mean segfaults at runtime, not ICEs.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 11:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 11:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-09-22 11:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=23567
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I don't see any flags marking it as not trapping?
Related to PR 23567 (which was fixed but maybe not fully).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 11:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-09-22 11:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-30 2:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-09-22 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think PR23567 is quite different, that was about stores to a place that might
not be writable, this is about making a possibly trapping conditional load
being unconditional.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-22 11:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-30 2:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-30 12:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-30 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needs-bisection
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
This testcase seems to be fixed on the trunk. It would be useful to know where
it was fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-30 2:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-30 12:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-30 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-30 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It still fails for me. As I corrected in #c7, I didn't mean ICE but
miscompilation (at -O3).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-30 12:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-30 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-30 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> It still fails for me. As I corrected in #c7, I didn't mean ICE but
> miscompilation (at -O3).
Yes it does still fail for me too, I don't know what I was doing wrong last
night.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-30 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-29 12:22 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-07-29 12:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-29 12:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-29 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] wrong
|wrong code at -O3 on |code at -O3 on
|x86_64-linux-gnu |x86_64-linux-gnu
Keywords| |needs-bisection
Known to work| |12.1.1, 13.0
Known to fail| |11.3.1
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It no longer fails on trunk and the branch. What fixed it? Still broken on
the GCC 11 branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-29 12:22 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-07-29 12:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-29 12:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-29 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
On the trunk r13-1186-ga0c30fe3b888f20215f and that has been backported in
r12-8523-g9e72a522dd9f835dd15.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-29 12:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-07-29 12:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [11 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-29 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So dup or related to PR106032.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/102446] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2021-09-22 9:00 [Bug tree-optimization/102446] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-29 12:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
18 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102446
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread