public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102756] [12 Regression] Complete unrolling is too senative to PRE; c-c++-common/torture/vector-compare-2.c Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 08:22:02 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102756-4-rG0AyR7rP6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-102756-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102756 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Btw, the same happens on x86-64. With -O2 and vectorization we end up with <bb 3> [local count: 858993457]: # ivtmp.14_11 = PHI <ivtmp.14_12(5), ivtmp.14_13(2)> _14 = (void *) ivtmp.14_11; _1 = MEM <int> [(vector(4) int *)_14]; if (_1 != -3) goto <bb 4>; [0.00%] else goto <bb 5>; [100.00%] <bb 4> [count: 0]: __builtin_abort (); <bb 5> [local count: 858993457]: ivtmp.14_12 = ivtmp.14_11 + 4; if (ivtmp.14_12 != _16) goto <bb 3>; [80.00%] else goto <bb 6>; [20.00%] <bb 6> [local count: 214748368]: r ={v} {CLOBBER}; while everything is optimized away with -O2 -fno-tree-vectorize. Let's keep this open as a regression since -O2 now enables vectorization. In principle we could preserve the previous behavior for the very-cheap vectorizer cost model or adjust the heuristic for that case to only cover loops with a single BB. The real issue here is of course the unroller not considering the true size after simplification.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 8:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-15 0:16 [Bug tree-optimization/102756] New: [12 Regression] Vectorizer change creates poor code for c-c++-common/torture/vector-compare-2.c law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-15 0:29 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102756] [12 Regression] Complete unrolling is too senative to PRE; c-c++-common/torture/vector-compare-2.c pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-15 0:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-15 6:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-15 14:44 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-17 16:28 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-17 16:29 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-01-19 8:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-05-06 8:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102756] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-26 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-08 12:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102756] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102756-4-rG0AyR7rP6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).