public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "theodort at inf dot ethz.ch" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/102981] New: [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:38:56 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-102981-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102981 Bug ID: 102981 Summary: [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: theodort at inf dot ethz.ch Target Milestone: --- cat test.c void foo(void); void bar(void); static int a; static short b[2][2][2] = {1}; int main() { int c = 0; short d = 0; for (; d <= 1; d++) { if (c) foo(); for (; a < 0; a++) { bar(); if (!b[d][d][d]) c = 1; } } } 11.2.0 at -O3 can eliminate the call to foo but trunk at -O3 cannot: gcc-11 test.c -O3 -S -o /dev/stdout ... main: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movl a(%rip), %eax testl %eax, %eax jns .L6 subq $8, %rsp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L3: call bar addl $1, a(%rip) js .L3 xorl %eax, %eax addq $8, %rsp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .L6: xorl %eax, %eax ret .cfi_endproc gcc-trunk test.c -O3 -S -o /dev/stdout main: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc pushq %r12 .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 .cfi_offset 12, -16 movl $1, %r12d pushq %rbp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 24 .cfi_offset 6, -24 movl $b, %ebp pushq %rbx .cfi_def_cfa_offset 32 .cfi_offset 3, -32 xorl %ebx, %ebx .L2: movl a(%rip), %eax testl %eax, %eax jns .L4 .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L6: call bar cmpw $0, 0(%rbp) cmove %r12d, %ebx addl $1, a(%rip) js .L6 .L4: addq $14, %rbp cmpq $b+28, %rbp je .L14 testl %ebx, %ebx je .L2 call foo jmp .L2 .p2align 4,,10 .p2align 3 .L14: popq %rbx .cfi_def_cfa_offset 24 xorl %eax, %eax popq %rbp .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16 popq %r12 .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8 ret .cfi_endproc gcc-trunk -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 12.0.0 20211028 (experimental) (GCC) It started with https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=d8edfadfc7a9795b65177a50ce44fd348858e844
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-28 9:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-10-28 9:38 theodort at inf dot ethz.ch [this message] 2021-10-28 11:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102981] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-30 7:03 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-30 17:42 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-10-30 18:08 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-04 18:47 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-16 20:08 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-17 9:49 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-11-23 19:19 ` aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-06 8:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102981] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-05-08 12:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102981] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-102981-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).