public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "george at bott dot gg" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:17:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102989-4-CY9KzwjMQy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
George Bott <george at bott dot gg> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |george at bott dot gg
--- Comment #34 from George Bott <george at bott dot gg> ---
I am currently using clangs support for up to 256 bit integers for crypto
related use cases and also non-power of 2 integers such as 160 bits. These are
not just used as storage, we are performing integer math on them and using the
__builtin_checked family of functions. I understand that the standard family of
checked functions that replace these builtin functions will be used instead
when implemented on clang.
Limiting this to 128 bit, while being standard complaint, would not allow us to
compile on GCC.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-28 17:41 [Bug c/102989] New: Add Clang's _ExtInt(N) colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 17:54 ` [Bug c/102989] " colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 17:57 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 17:57 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 18:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-28 18:11 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 21:41 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2021-10-28 21:47 ` [Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-28 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-11 19:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-11 19:58 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-11-11 21:27 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-25 12:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 15:25 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-10-25 20:32 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-25 20:42 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-10-25 20:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-10-25 21:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:50 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26 6:29 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26 6:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26 8:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26 17:29 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-28 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-28 10:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-28 10:51 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-10-28 11:02 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2022-10-28 17:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-28 20:31 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-28 20:39 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-04-09 19:59 ` leni536 at gmail dot com
2023-04-12 22:17 ` george at bott dot gg [this message]
2023-05-11 18:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 18:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 22:10 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-05-12 7:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 16:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-23 12:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 11:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 12:46 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-24 13:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 13:29 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-24 14:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 14:57 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-24 15:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-26 16:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-26 16:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-26 17:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-02 10:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 17:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05 7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05 7:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05 7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05 7:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05 8:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-05 8:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06 7:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-15 11:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-15 18:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-19 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-20 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 19:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 17:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 18:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 17:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 17:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 19:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-05 17:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 14:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 17:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-11 11:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-12 16:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-13 18:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 11:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 11:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 17:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-17 10:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-17 18:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 11:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-20 15:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-21 17:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25 14:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 13:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 17:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27 15:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-10 7:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-10 7:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-10 15:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-14 21:55 ` tmgross at umich dot edu
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-07 9:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-12 14:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-14 7:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-14 22:38 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-01 8:17 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-01 9:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-102989-4-CY9KzwjMQy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).