public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 15:58:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-102989-4-cfrEOqiPqi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-102989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989

--- Comment #110 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52e2aaaa70e847d240fb68a27c88ee60189515a6

commit r14-3759-g52e2aaaa70e847d240fb68a27c88ee60189515a6
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Sep 6 17:52:24 2023 +0200

    Additional _BitInt test coverage [PR102989]

    On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 10:40:26PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
    > Additional tests I think should be added (for things I expect should
    > already work):
    >
    > * Tests for BITINT_MAXWIDTH in <limits.h>.  Test that it's defined for
    > C2x, but not defined for C11/C17 (the latter independent of whether the
    > target has _BitInt support).  Test the value as well: _BitInt
    > (BITINT_MAXWIDTH) should be OK (both signed and unsigned) but _BitInt
    > (BITINT_MAXWIDTH + 1) should not be OK.  Also test that BITINT_MAXWIDTH
>=
    > ULLONG_MAX.
    >
    > * Test _BitInt (N) where N is a constexpr variable or enum constant (I
    > expect these should work - the required call to convert_lvalue_to_rvalue
    > for constexpr to work is present - but I don't see such tests in the
    > testsuite).
    >
    > * Test that -funsigned-bitfields does not affect the signedness of
_BitInt
    > (N) bit-fields (the standard wording isn't entirely clear, but that's
    > what's implemented in the patches).
    >
    > * Test the errors for _Sat used with _BitInt (though such a test might
not
    > actually run at present because no target supports both features).

    The following patch does that plus for most of the new changes in the
    C _BitInt support patch requested in patch review it also does testsuite
    coverage.

    2023-09-06  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c/102989
            * gcc.dg/bitint-2.c (foo): Add tests for constexpr var or
enumerator
            arguments of _BitInt.
            * gcc.dg/bitint-31.c: Remove forgotten 0 &&.
            * gcc.dg/bitint-32.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/bitint-33.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/bitint-34.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/bitint-35.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/bitint-36.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/fixed-point/bitint-1.c: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-06 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-28 17:41 [Bug c/102989] New: Add Clang's _ExtInt(N) colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 17:54 ` [Bug c/102989] " colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 17:57 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 17:57 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 18:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-28 18:11 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-10-28 21:41 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2021-10-28 21:47 ` [Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-28 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-11 19:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-11 19:58 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2021-11-11 21:27 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-25 12:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 15:25 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-10-25 20:32 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-25 20:42 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-10-25 20:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:05 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2022-10-25 21:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:30 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25 21:50 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26  6:29 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26  6:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26  8:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-26 17:29 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-28  9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-28 10:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-28 10:51 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-10-28 11:02 ` colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
2022-10-28 17:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-28 20:31 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-10-28 20:39 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-04-09 19:59 ` leni536 at gmail dot com
2023-04-12 22:17 ` george at bott dot gg
2023-05-11 18:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 18:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-11 22:10 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-05-12  7:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-12  8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 16:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-17  7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-23 12:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 11:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 12:46 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-24 13:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 13:29 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-24 14:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-24 14:57 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-05-24 15:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-26 16:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-26 16:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-26 17:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 10:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-02 10:53 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-02 17:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05  7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05  7:34 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05  7:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05  7:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-05  8:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-06-05  8:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-06  7:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-15 11:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-15 18:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-19 17:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-20 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-22 19:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-23 17:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 18:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-28 17:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-29 17:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-30 19:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-05 17:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 14:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 17:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-11 11:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-12 16:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-13 18:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 11:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 11:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-14 17:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-17 10:21 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-17 18:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 11:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-18 15:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-20 15:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-21 17:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25 14:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 13:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-26 17:41 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-27 15:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-10  7:22 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-10  7:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-10 15:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-14 21:55 ` tmgross at umich dot edu
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 15:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-09-07  9:21 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-12 14:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-14  7:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-14 22:38 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-01  8:17 ` gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-11-01  9:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-102989-4-cfrEOqiPqi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).