public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/102996] New: No warning on use dereferencing of uninitialized point in an array
@ 2021-10-29 7:34 eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
2021-10-29 9:49 ` [Bug c/102996] No warning on dereferencing of uninitialized pointer in an array, in a loop rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: eyalroz1 at gmx dot com @ 2021-10-29 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102996
Bug ID: 102996
Summary: No warning on use dereferencing of uninitialized point
in an array
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Consider the following two functions:
void foo() {
int *as[2];
*(as[0])=1;
}
void bar() {
int i = 0;
int *as[2];
for(i=0;i<1;i++)
{
*(as[i])=i;
}
}
When compiling these with -Wall, we get warnings about the uninitialized use of
as in the first function, but not in the second one.
GodBolt: https://godbolt.org/z/Ta9fWYWs6
Inspired by this StackOverflow question:
https://stackoverflow.com/q/69764896/1593077
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/102996] No warning on dereferencing of uninitialized pointer in an array, in a loop
2021-10-29 7:34 [Bug c/102996] New: No warning on use dereferencing of uninitialized point in an array eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
@ 2021-10-29 9:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-29 10:10 ` eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
2021-10-29 15:03 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102996] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-29 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102996
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-10-29
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Blocks| |24639
Keywords| |diagnostic
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The foo form is handled by the early uninit pass but the bar form is optimized
away as dead before we get to do a late warning.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
[Bug 24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/102996] No warning on dereferencing of uninitialized pointer in an array, in a loop
2021-10-29 7:34 [Bug c/102996] New: No warning on use dereferencing of uninitialized point in an array eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
2021-10-29 9:49 ` [Bug c/102996] No warning on dereferencing of uninitialized pointer in an array, in a loop rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-29 10:10 ` eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
2021-10-29 15:03 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102996] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: eyalroz1 at gmx dot com @ 2021-10-29 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102996
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1 at gmx dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The foo form is handled by the early uninit pass
Since _none_ of `as` is initialized, one could argue that an early uninit pass
could catch that as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/102996] No warning on dereferencing of uninitialized pointer in an array, in a loop
2021-10-29 7:34 [Bug c/102996] New: No warning on use dereferencing of uninitialized point in an array eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
2021-10-29 9:49 ` [Bug c/102996] No warning on dereferencing of uninitialized pointer in an array, in a loop rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-29 10:10 ` eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
@ 2021-10-29 15:03 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-29 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102996
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|c |tree-optimization
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The early uninit pass deliberately defers the conditional cases to the late
pass to avoid false positives. It only handles straightforward unconditionally
uninitialized reads. It could probably do better.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-29 15:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-29 7:34 [Bug c/102996] New: No warning on use dereferencing of uninitialized point in an array eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
2021-10-29 9:49 ` [Bug c/102996] No warning on dereferencing of uninitialized pointer in an array, in a loop rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-29 10:10 ` eyalroz1 at gmx dot com
2021-10-29 15:03 ` [Bug tree-optimization/102996] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).