public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
@ 2021-11-16 18:41 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-11-16 18:42 ` [Bug fortran/103287] " gscfq@t-online.de
` (10 more replies)
0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2021-11-16 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
Bug ID: 103287
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at
fortran/interface.c:2240
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gscfq@t-online.de
Target Milestone: ---
Changed between 20210919 and 20210926 :
(gcc configured with --enable-checking=yes)
$ cat z1.f90
subroutine g
call s([1])
end
subroutine h(x)
integer, pointer :: x(..)
call s(x)
end
$ gfortran-12-20211114 -c z1.f90
z1.f90:6:10:
6 | call s(x)
| 1
Error: Assumed-rank argument requires an explicit interface at (1)
f951: internal compiler error: in argument_rank_mismatch, at
fortran/interface.c:2240
0x7e3746 argument_rank_mismatch
../../gcc/fortran/interface.c:2240
0x7e7325 compare_parameter
../../gcc/fortran/interface.c:2666
0x7e7325 gfc_compare_actual_formal(gfc_actual_arglist**, gfc_formal_arglist*,
int, int, bool, locus*)
../../gcc/fortran/interface.c:3200
0x94c266 check_externals_procedure
../../gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c:5725
0x950f59 gfc_code_walker(gfc_code**, int (*)(gfc_code**, int*, void*), int
(*)(gfc_expr**, int*, void*), void*)
../../gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c:5333
0x9527bb gfc_check_externals0
../../gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c:5844
0x953644 gfc_check_externals(gfc_namespace*)
../../gcc/fortran/frontend-passes.c:5866
0x83b732 gfc_parse_file()
../../gcc/fortran/parse.c:6856
0x8896bf gfc_be_parse_file
../../gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:216
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2021-11-16 18:42 ` gscfq@t-online.de
2021-11-16 20:05 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gscfq@t-online.de @ 2021-11-16 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
G. Steinmetz <gscfq@t-online.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz <gscfq@t-online.de> ---
It should be added that following variant started with r10,
between 20190908 and 20190915 :
$ cat z2.f90
subroutine g
call s(1)
end
subroutine h(x)
integer, pointer :: x(..)
call s(x)
end
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-11-16 18:42 ` [Bug fortran/103287] " gscfq@t-online.de
@ 2021-11-16 20:05 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-16 20:08 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-16 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-11-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Change an assert to an if-statement and simply return.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.c b/gcc/fortran/interface.c
index 30c99ef3938..8bd507be67c 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/interface.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.c
@@ -2237,7 +2237,9 @@ argument_rank_mismatch (const char *name, locus *where,
}
else
{
- gcc_assert (rank2 != -1);
+ if (rank2 == -1)
+ return;
+
if (rank1 == 0)
gfc_error_opt (0, "Rank mismatch between actual argument at %L "
"and actual argument at %L (scalar and rank-%d)",
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-11-16 18:42 ` [Bug fortran/103287] " gscfq@t-online.de
2021-11-16 20:05 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-16 20:08 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-18 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-16 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-16 20:08 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-18 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-18 10:35 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-18 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-18 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-18 10:35 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 1:48 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-18 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |sandra at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r12-3827-g7a40f2e74815a926, it was rejected before the revision.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-18 10:35 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-13 1:48 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 2:11 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-13 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The proposed fix in comment 2 looks OK to me, although I'd like to see a
comment here like
"This case corresponds to an assumed-rank actual passed to a function without
an explicit interface, which is diagnosed in gfc_procedure_use."
to explain what is going on.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-13 1:48 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-13 2:11 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 20:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-13 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #4)
> The proposed fix in comment 2 looks OK to me, although I'd like to see a
> comment here like
>
> "This case corresponds to an assumed-rank actual passed to a function
> without an explicit interface, which is diagnosed in gfc_procedure_use."
>
> to explain what is going on.
I no longer commit patches. Feel free to do whatever you want here;
although, I think the comment is unwarranted.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-13 2:11 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-06 20:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 20:47 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-06 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore <sandra@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e2771069ed0c157cca825d6af5792e94c4407c1
commit r12-6322-g8e2771069ed0c157cca825d6af5792e94c4407c1
Author: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
Date: Wed Jan 5 13:18:10 2022 -0800
Fortran: Fix ICE in argument_rank_mismatch [PR103287]
This patch removes an incorrect assertion. A user-friendly error for this
case is already given elsewhere.
2022-01-05 Steve Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
PR fortran/103287
gcc/fortran/
* interface.c (argument_rank_mismatch): Replace incorrect assertion
with return.
gcc/testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/c-interop/pr103287-1.f90: new.
* gfortran.dg/c-interop/pr103287-2.f90: new.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-06 20:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-06 20:47 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: sandra at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-06 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Should be fixed now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-06 20:47 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-16 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jrfsousa at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 100024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-16 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 100025 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-16 20:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-16 18:41 [Bug fortran/103287] New: [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240 gscfq@t-online.de
2021-11-16 18:42 ` [Bug fortran/103287] " gscfq@t-online.de
2021-11-16 20:05 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-16 20:08 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-18 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-18 10:35 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 1:48 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 2:11 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 20:46 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 20:47 ` sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-16 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).