public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489
@ 2021-11-29 21:11 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-29 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
Bug ID: 103479
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after
r12-5489
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:0888d6bbe97e10de0e624f4ab46acc276e5ee1d7, r12-5489
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c scan-tree-dump-times dce7 "= 0" 1
# of expected passes 2
# of unexpected failures 1
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home3/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ exceptions_enabled2369981.cc
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -S -o exceptions_enabled2369981.s
PASS: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c (test for excess errors)
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to ...
Execution timeout is: 300
spawn [open ...]
PASS: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c execution test
gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c: pattern found 2 times
FAIL: gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c scan-tree-dump-times dce7 "= 0" 1
commit 0888d6bbe97e10de0e624f4ab46acc276e5ee1d7 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com>
Date: Wed Nov 24 06:38:18 2021 +0000
middle-end: Convert bitclear <imm> + cmp<cc> #0 into cm<cc2> <imm2>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489
2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-30 6:13 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 7:06 ` [Bug testsuite/103479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Could you post the dce7 dump file if you have it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489
2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-30 7:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|middle-end |testsuite
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489
2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 7:06 ` [Bug testsuite/103479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 51907
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51907&action=edit
dec7 dump file
Dump file attached
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489
2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-30 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #2)
> Created attachment 51907 [details]
> dec7 dump file
>
> Dump file attached
Got it, thanks, I'll fix it today, the regexp is too liberal in this case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489
2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-02 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina <tnfchris@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d6c20c06ce4e5d595245af503b045c2032c02f7
commit r12-5713-g7d6c20c06ce4e5d595245af503b045c2032c02f7
Author: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com>
Date: Thu Dec 2 13:30:08 2021 +0000
testsuite: make bic-bitmask-18.c test more precise [PR103479]
This updates the testcase bic-bitmask-18.c to seach for " = 0;" as an
expression
so it doesn't match any other partial expressions.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR testsuite/103479
* gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c: Update regexpr to expect = 0;.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103479] [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489
2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-02 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103479
Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should be fixed now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-02 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-29 21:11 [Bug middle-end/103479] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/bic-bitmask-18.c fails after r12-5489 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 6:13 ` [Bug middle-end/103479] " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 7:06 ` [Bug testsuite/103479] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 13:28 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-30 13:42 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 13:35 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 13:36 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).