public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/103522] New: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in r12-5649
@ 2021-12-01 20:28 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 2:01 ` [Bug testsuite/103522] " siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 7:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-01 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522
Bug ID: 103522
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in
r12-5649
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
g:da9386f9a70ac494939650c0e0a0e4168a6f76d8, r12-5649
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="ubsan.exp=gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c"
# of expected passes 15
# of unresolved testcases 1
This is on powerpc64 LE.
commit da9386f9a70ac494939650c0e0a0e4168a6f76d8 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Date: Wed Dec 1 12:58:12 2021 +0530
tree-optimization/103456 - Record only successes from object_sizes_set
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103522] New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in r12-5649
2021-12-01 20:28 [Bug tree-optimization/103522] New: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in r12-5649 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-02 2:01 ` siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 7:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-02 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2021-12-02
--- Comment #1 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK I see it on x86_64 too and seems to be specific to executing from ubsan.exp
instead of dg.exp. So the tree-objsz dump file does not seem to get generated
when -flto is present, presumably because the pass gets skipped? The test
needs to be skipped in this case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/103522] New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in r12-5649
2021-12-01 20:28 [Bug tree-optimization/103522] New: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in r12-5649 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 2:01 ` [Bug testsuite/103522] " siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-08 7:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-08 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103522
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed since r12-5770-g97ffef3553267f52ca83.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-08 7:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-01 20:28 [Bug tree-optimization/103522] New: New test case gcc.dg/ubsan/pr103456.c fails in r12-5649 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 2:01 ` [Bug testsuite/103522] " siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-08 7:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).