public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/103534] [12 regression] Spurious -Wstringop-overflow warning with std::string concatencation
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 21:53:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103534-4-O4desJJiQn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103534-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103534

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |alias, missed-optimization

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note there is one missing optimization:
  D.42086._M_string_length = 0;
  MEM[(char_type &)&D.42086 + 16] = 0;
  MEM[(struct basic_string *)&D.41925] ={v} {CLOBBER};
  MEM[(struct _Alloc_hider *)&D.41925] ={v} {CLOBBER};
  MEM[(struct _Alloc_hider *)&D.41925]._M_p = &D.41925.D.33308._M_local_buf;
  _69 = operator new (17);

  <bb 3> [local count: 1003797485]:
  D.41925._M_dataplus._M_p = _69;
  D.41925.D.33308._M_allocated_capacity = 16;
  __builtin_memcpy (_69, "1234567890123456", 16);
  D.41925._M_string_length = 16;
  MEM[(char_type &)_69 + 16] = 0;
  _75 = D.42086._M_string_length;
  __size_76 = _75 + 16;
  pretmp_56 = D.42086._M_dataplus._M_p;
  if (__size_76 > 16)
    goto <bb 4>; [67.00%]
  else
    goto <bb 12>; [33.00%]


This might be related to that GCC does not handle the operator new better.
Obvious if that missed optimization is fixed, then the warning will be gone.

I also noticed that with -std=c++17 (or before), the constructor for
std::string is not inlined fully for both std::string objects which avoids the
false positive.

This is another case where it is a "maybe" exceeds maximum object size and we
need to come up with a solution for it.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-02 21:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-02 19:47 [Bug c++/103534] New: " sss@li-snyder.org
2021-12-02 21:03 ` [Bug c++/103534] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 21:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2021-12-02 23:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-02 23:19 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-06  8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-10 16:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-10 16:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-10 16:37 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-10 16:53 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-10 17:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-11  4:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 16:11 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-13 16:11 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103534-4-O4desJJiQn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).