public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/103605] [PowerPC] fmin/fmax should be inlined always with xsmindp/xsmaxdp
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:46:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103605-4-3xYZa2lvIG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103605-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605

--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote:

> C99/11 standard
> If just one argument is a NaN, the fmin functions return the other argument (if
> both arguments are NaNs, the functions return a NaN).
> fmin(NaN, 3.0) = fmin(3.0, NaN) = 3.0

"NaN" here means quiet NaN.

> xsmindp
> The minimum of a QNaN and any value is that value. The minimum of any value and
> an SNaN is that SNaN converted to a QNaN.
> xsmindp(NaN, 3.0) = 3.0 xsmindp(3.0, NaN) = NaN

That seems right for fmin, provided that (QNaN, SNaN) arguments in either 
order produce a QNaN result (with "invalid" raised).  Note that fmin and 
fmax follow the old operations from IEEE 754-2008 (that aren't associative 
in the presence of SNaN), not any of the new operations from IEEE 
754-2019.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-07 16:21 [Bug target/103605] New: " pc at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 16:21 ` [Bug target/103605] " pc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-26  9:27 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-26 18:35 ` pc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-26 18:46 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2022-04-26 20:45 ` pc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-27  5:32 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-28  3:22 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-10 12:21 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-25  2:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-17  5:26 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103605-4-3xYZa2lvIG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).