public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/103605] [PowerPC] fmin/fmax should be inlined always with xsmindp/xsmaxdp Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 18:46:11 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-103605-4-3xYZa2lvIG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-103605-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103605 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> --- On Tue, 26 Apr 2022, guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote: > C99/11 standard > If just one argument is a NaN, the fmin functions return the other argument (if > both arguments are NaNs, the functions return a NaN). > fmin(NaN, 3.0) = fmin(3.0, NaN) = 3.0 "NaN" here means quiet NaN. > xsmindp > The minimum of a QNaN and any value is that value. The minimum of any value and > an SNaN is that SNaN converted to a QNaN. > xsmindp(NaN, 3.0) = 3.0 xsmindp(3.0, NaN) = NaN That seems right for fmin, provided that (QNaN, SNaN) arguments in either order produce a QNaN result (with "invalid" raised). Note that fmin and fmax follow the old operations from IEEE 754-2008 (that aren't associative in the presence of SNaN), not any of the new operations from IEEE 754-2019.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 18:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-12-07 16:21 [Bug target/103605] New: " pc at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-07 16:21 ` [Bug target/103605] " pc at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 9:27 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 18:35 ` pc at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-26 18:46 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com [this message] 2022-04-26 20:45 ` pc at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-27 5:32 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-04-28 3:22 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-10 12:21 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-25 2:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-17 5:26 ` guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-103605-4-3xYZa2lvIG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).