public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/103714] New: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing
@ 2021-12-14 17:16 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-14 17:18 ` [Bug c++/103714] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714

            Bug ID: 103714
           Summary: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause
                    finds wrong thing
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.2.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: accepts-invalid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

This invalid code started to be accepted at r11-8144


template <int I>
struct derp
{
        constexpr inline static int i = I;

    template <int J>
    void f(derp<J> d) requires(d.i < i)
    {
        __builtin_printf("derp %zu < %zu\n", d.i, i);
        derp<I> d2;
        f(d2);
    }
};

int main()
{
    derp<9> d9;
    derp<8> d8;

    d9.f(d8);
}


If the requires clause is changed to (d.derp<J>::i < i) then it is correctly
rejected, but for some reason (d.i < i) is satisfied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/103714] [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing
  2021-12-14 17:16 [Bug c++/103714] New: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-14 17:18 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-14 22:26 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2021-12-14
           Priority|P3                          |P2
      Known to fail|                            |11.1.0, 11.2.0, 12.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |11.3
      Known to work|                            |10.3.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Running the code shows that it recurses until the stack overflows:

derp 8 < 9
derp 9 < 9
derp 9 < 9
derp 9 < 9
derp 9 < 9

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/103714] [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing
  2021-12-14 17:16 [Bug c++/103714] New: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-14 17:18 ` [Bug c++/103714] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-14 22:26 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-19 17:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-14 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/103714] [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing
  2021-12-14 17:16 [Bug c++/103714] New: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-14 17:18 ` [Bug c++/103714] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-14 22:26 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-19 17:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-19 19:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-19 19:10 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-19 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30c286aa9377850c64aa35f5845a59d321a44be0

commit r12-6063-g30c286aa9377850c64aa35f5845a59d321a44be0
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun Dec 19 12:10:16 2021 -0500

    c++: local_specializations and recursive constrained fn [PR103714]

    Here during constraint checking for the inner call to A<0>::f<0>,
    substitution into the PARM_DECL d in the atomic constraint yields the
    wrong local specialization because local_specializations at this point
    is nonempty, and contains specializations for the caller A<0>::f<1>.

    This patch makes us call push_to_top_level during satisfaction, which'll
    temporarily clear local_specializations for us.

            PR c++/103714

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * constraint.cc (satisfy_declaration_constraints): Do
            push_to_top_level and pop_from_top_level around the call to
            satisfy_normalized_constraints.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/103714] [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing
  2021-12-14 17:16 [Bug c++/103714] New: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-12-19 17:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-19 19:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2021-12-19 19:10 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-19 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
<ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75d95f5f0151247c39f0beb01376485806d0fd47

commit r11-9401-g75d95f5f0151247c39f0beb01376485806d0fd47
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun Dec 19 12:10:16 2021 -0500

    c++: local_specializations and recursive constrained fn [PR103714]

    Here during constraint checking for the inner call to A<0>::f<0>,
    substitution into the PARM_DECL d in the atomic constraint yields the
    wrong local specialization because local_specializations at this point
    is nonempty, and contains specializations for the caller A<0>::f<1>.

    This patch makes us call push_to_top_level during satisfaction, which'll
    temporarily clear local_specializations for us.

            PR c++/103714

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * constraint.cc (satisfy_declaration_constraints): Do
            push_to_top_level and pop_from_top_level around the call to
            satisfy_normalized_constraints.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-uneval5.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit 30c286aa9377850c64aa35f5845a59d321a44be0)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/103714] [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing
  2021-12-14 17:16 [Bug c++/103714] New: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2021-12-19 19:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-19 19:10 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-19 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103714

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed for GCC 11.3/12.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-19 19:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-14 17:16 [Bug c++/103714] New: [11/12 Regression] name lookup in requires-clause finds wrong thing redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 17:18 ` [Bug c++/103714] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-14 22:26 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-19 17:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-19 19:10 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-19 19:10 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).