public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code @ 2021-12-25 22:16 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-25 22:17 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 more replies) 0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-25 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Bug ID: 103829 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: x86_64-linux-gnu aarch64-linux-gnu Take: extern int _IO_getc (void *) ; extern int *__errno_location (void) __attribute__ ((__const__)); void readError ( void ); typedef struct { void* handle; int buffer; int buffLive; char mode; } BitStream; int bsGetBit ( BitStream* bs ) { if (bs->buffLive > 0) { bs->buffLive --; return ( ((bs->buffer) >> (bs->buffLive)) & 0x1 ); } else { int retVal = _IO_getc (bs->handle); if ( retVal == (-1) ) { if ((*__errno_location ()) != 0) readError(); return 2; } bs->buffLive = 7; bs->buffer = retVal; return ( ((bs->buffer) >> 7) & 0x1 ); } } ----- CUT ---- GCC 4.9.0-8.5.0 was able to shrink wrap the above function. But starting in GCC 9, GCC does not; there is an extra mov using a callee saved register. This happens on both aarch64 and x86_64 So I suspect it was a generic change which caused it. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code 2021-12-25 22:16 [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-25 22:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-25 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |9.1.0 Known to work| |8.5.0 See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=87902 Target Milestone|--- |9.5 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Might be similar to PR 87902 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code 2021-12-25 22:16 [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-25 22:17 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- GCC 9 branch is being closed ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code 2021-12-25 22:16 [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-25 22:17 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-14 4:53 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [10/11/12/13 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code 2021-12-25 22:16 [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-04-14 4:53 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-04-14 4:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |law at gcc dot gnu.org Priority|P3 |P2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [11/12/13/14 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code 2021-12-25 22:16 [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2023-04-14 4:53 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103829 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- GCC 10 branch is being closed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-12-25 22:16 [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing shrink wrapping for simple/obvious code pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-12-25 22:17 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-14 4:53 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 10:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/103829] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).