public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/103931] Type name "c_ptr" is ambiguous when iso_c_binding is imported both directly and indirectly
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:56:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103931-4-RRDaOiR0wD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103931-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103931

--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #13)
> > This PR may be a duplicate of others that describe gfortran's confusion
> > when using (intrinsic) modules along a module chain like here.
> 
> There are 50 bugs with "module" in the description, i should go through them
> to see if there are similar cases. Or do you by chance remember a specific
> one in that area?

IIRC the bug could to be connected to the "USE" of intrinsic modules,
e.g. pr66973.

There should be another one where intrinsic modules and BLOCK are used,
but I have to look for it.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-06 15:39 [Bug fortran/103931] New: " trnka at scm dot com
2022-01-06 16:55 ` [Bug fortran/103931] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 21:40 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 22:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 22:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 22:50 ` trnka at scm dot com
2022-01-06 22:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-06 22:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-07  7:03 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 20:12 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-01 19:50 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-02 15:54 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-02 18:59 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 17:20 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 18:56 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-13 19:59 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-14 17:21 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-24 16:17 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-24 16:29 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-24 20:14 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-25 18:16 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-25 18:46 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-25 19:03 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103931-4-RRDaOiR0wD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).