public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/104271] [12 Regression] 538.imagick_r run-time at -Ofast -march=native regressed by 26% on Intel Cascade Lake server CPU
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:17:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-104271-4-Ef241qNhRK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-104271-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Does this still happen after the last fiddling?
Unfortunately yes, the run-time is still 27% worse than when compiled with the
commit previous to the one identified in the bug summary (I tried with
e6a3991ea15).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-23 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-28 17:12 [Bug target/104271] New: " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-31 8:11 ` [Bug target/104271] [12 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-31 9:08 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-07 1:31 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-02-07 18:10 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-08 2:49 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-03-23 12:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-23 16:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-03-24 8:34 ` lili.cui at intel dot com
2022-03-29 6:48 ` lili.cui at intel dot com
2022-03-29 10:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-15 11:04 ` lili.cui at intel dot com
2022-05-06 8:32 ` [Bug target/104271] [12/13 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-28 3:24 ` lili.cui at intel dot com
2023-05-08 12:23 ` [Bug target/104271] [12 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-07 2:07 ` lili.cui at intel dot com
2023-06-07 7:02 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-07 7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-104271-4-Ef241qNhRK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).