public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/104501] New: vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider smaller vectors
@ 2022-02-11 12:58 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-02-11 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104501] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-02-14  7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-11 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104501

            Bug ID: 104501
           Summary: vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider
                    smaller vectors
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

The following C++ testcase is decomposed to scalar operations by vector
lowering when compiling with just SSE2 support.  But when using a vector size
of 16 we
can produce optimized code.

typedef int vsi __attribute__((vector_size(32)));

vsi res, v1, v2, v3, v4;

void foo ()
{
  res = v1 == v2 ? v3 : v4;
}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/104501] vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider smaller vectors
  2022-02-11 12:58 [Bug tree-optimization/104501] New: vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider smaller vectors rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-11 18:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-02-14  7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-11 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104501

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this is direct dup of bug 55001.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/104501] vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider smaller vectors
  2022-02-11 12:58 [Bug tree-optimization/104501] New: vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider smaller vectors rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-02-11 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104501] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-02-14  7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-14  7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104501

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
yep

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 55001 ***

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-14  7:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-11 12:58 [Bug tree-optimization/104501] New: vector lowering for VEC_COND_EXPR does not consider smaller vectors rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-11 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104501] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-14  7:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).