public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/104512] New: [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members @ 2022-02-12 9:52 fchelnokov at gmail dot com 2022-02-12 10:02 ` [Bug c++/104512] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: fchelnokov at gmail dot com @ 2022-02-12 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104512 Bug ID: 104512 Summary: [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: fchelnokov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In the next program struct B has immediate consteval default constructor, which does not initialize i field. Then this constructor is used to make a temporary and its i field remains untouched: ``` struct B { bool b = true; int i; consteval B() {} }; static_assert( B{}.b ); ``` Clang and MSVC are fine with it. But GCC complains: error: 'B{true}' is not a constant expression 7 | static_assert( B{}.b ); | ^ error: 'B()' is not a constant expression because it refers to an incompletely initialized variable Demo: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/x4n6ezrhT The requirement that "every non-variant non-static data member must be initialized" in constexpr/consteval constructor is removed since c++20. Related discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/a/71085832/7325599 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104512] [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members 2022-02-12 9:52 [Bug c++/104512] New: [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members fchelnokov at gmail dot com @ 2022-02-12 10:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 0:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-02-12 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104512 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- constexpr works but consteval does not. Also I notice ICC rejects the consteval version but accepts the constexpr one. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104512] [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members 2022-02-12 9:52 [Bug c++/104512] New: [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members fchelnokov at gmail dot com 2022-02-12 10:02 ` [Bug c++/104512] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-19 0:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 1:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-19 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104512 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://github.com/llvm/llv | |m-project/issues/57627, | |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=106485 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- ``` struct B { bool b = true; int i; consteval B() {} }; static_assert( []() consteval{ return B{}.b; }() ); ``` Works for GCC. I think this is a bug in clang ... static_assert is an immediate function context so B{} needs to be a evaluated and such. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57627 for the clang bug. See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106485#c2 . ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104512] [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members 2022-02-12 9:52 [Bug c++/104512] New: [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members fchelnokov at gmail dot com 2022-02-12 10:02 ` [Bug c++/104512] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 0:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-19 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 1:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-19 0:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104512 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > static_assert is an immediate function context static_assert is NOT an immediate function context sorry for the typo. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104512] [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members 2022-02-12 9:52 [Bug c++/104512] New: [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members fchelnokov at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2023-01-19 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-19 1:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-19 1:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104512 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > constexpr works but consteval does not. > > Also I notice ICC rejects the consteval version but accepts the constexpr > one. This gives the hint that both MSVC and clang are incorrect really. EDG also implements correctly static_assert not being an immediate function context. So closing as invalid. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-19 1:31 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-02-12 9:52 [Bug c++/104512] New: [c++20] consteval constructor does not need to initialize all data members fchelnokov at gmail dot com 2022-02-12 10:02 ` [Bug c++/104512] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 0:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 0:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-01-19 1:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).