public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/104924] New: bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules @ 2022-03-15 1:32 yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2022-03-15 1:37 ` [Bug c++/104924] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: yunior.eury at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-15 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104924 Bug ID: 104924 Summary: bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: yunior.eury at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- When compiling the following: ``` export module Chapter2; import <iostream>; import <variant>; export { class Object { std::variant<float, int> var; }; } ``` I get the following error in gcc: /usr/local/include/c++/11.2.1/variant:1285:9: internal compiler error: in build_op_delete_call, at cp/call.c:7144 1285 | class bad_variant_access : public exception If I change the order of the imports, then it compiles fine: ``` export module Chapter2; import <variant>; import <iostream>; export { class Object { std::variant<float, int> var; }; }``` g++ version: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/lto-wrapper OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1 Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 11.2.0-7ubuntu2' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-11/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-11 --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-bootstrap --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --enable-libphobos-checking=release --with-target-system-zlib=auto --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --enable-cet --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-11-ZPT0kp/gcc-11-11.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --enable-link-serialization=2 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.2.0 (Ubuntu 11.2.0-7ubuntu2) I compile the stl header files with the following commands: ``` g++ -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -xc++-system-header iostream g++ -std=c++20 -fmodules-ts -xc++-system-header variant ``` This looks very similar to Bug 103256. Is this behavior expected? Thanks in advance. Lorenzo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104924] bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules 2022-03-15 1:32 [Bug c++/104924] New: bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules yunior.eury at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-15 1:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-15 1:50 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-15 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104924 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- C++ modules in GCC 11 (and it looks like 12 but some bugs have been fixed there) is still considered experimental and your mileage on this feature will varry. Note I have not checked to see if this has been fixed on the trunk for GCC 12. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104924] bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules 2022-03-15 1:32 [Bug c++/104924] New: bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2022-03-15 1:37 ` [Bug c++/104924] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-15 1:50 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2022-03-20 21:19 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2024-03-06 22:14 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: yunior.eury at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-15 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104924 --- Comment #2 from Lorenzo Gomez <yunior.eury at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > C++ modules in GCC 11 (and it looks like 12 but some bugs have been fixed > there) is still considered experimental and your mileage on this feature > will varry. > > Note I have not checked to see if this has been fixed on the trunk for GCC > 12. This is a good point! I will try with GCC12 and check if this issue has been fixed whenever I get time. Thanks! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104924] bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules 2022-03-15 1:32 [Bug c++/104924] New: bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2022-03-15 1:37 ` [Bug c++/104924] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-15 1:50 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-20 21:19 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2024-03-06 22:14 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: yunior.eury at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-20 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104924 --- Comment #3 from Lorenzo Gomez <yunior.eury at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > C++ modules in GCC 11 (and it looks like 12 but some bugs have been fixed > there) is still considered experimental and your mileage on this feature > will varry. > > Note I have not checked to see if this has been fixed on the trunk for GCC > 12. Would like to report that I attempted to compile the same example on `gcc (GCC) 12.0.1 20220313 (experimental)` and it looks it has not been fixed yet. Hopefully it gets fixed soon. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/104924] bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules 2022-03-15 1:32 [Bug c++/104924] New: bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules yunior.eury at gmail dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2022-03-20 21:19 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com @ 2024-03-06 22:14 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-03-06 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104924 Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |13.0 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This seems fixed for GCC 13+. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-06 22:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-03-15 1:32 [Bug c++/104924] New: bad_variant_access When using iostream and variant as modules yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2022-03-15 1:37 ` [Bug c++/104924] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-15 1:50 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2022-03-20 21:19 ` yunior.eury at gmail dot com 2024-03-06 22:14 ` ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).