public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/104970] [12 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2133 since r12-6480-gea19c8f33a3a8d2b Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:18:01 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-104970-4-zYuBDVhXnK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-104970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I can't speak for Siddhesh, but at least the testcase coverage in r12-6480 only covered the access attribute. So perhaps the fix could be to just limit to that case if it is possible easily to differentiate that from the other cases. And certainly if it uses TYPE_SIZE_UNIT for something it needs to punt if it isn't a constant (or perhaps POLY_INT_CST), because the trees mentioned in there can't be reliably used during objsz1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 18:18 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-03-17 15:24 [Bug tree-optimization/104970] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-17 15:24 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104970] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-17 17:50 ` siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-21 11:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/104970] [12 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-21 12:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-21 17:19 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-21 17:22 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-21 18:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-03-22 0:25 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-23 5:56 ` siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-23 7:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-23 15:34 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-24 9:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-03-24 9:42 ` siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-28 21:53 ` muecker at gwdg dot de 2023-03-29 11:15 ` siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-30 17:17 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-104970-4-zYuBDVhXnK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).