public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
@ 2022-03-29 17:24 vanyacpp at gmail dot com
2022-03-30 9:35 ` [Bug c++/105099] In lookup of " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: vanyacpp at gmail dot com @ 2022-03-29 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Bug ID: 105099
Summary: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only
namespaces should be considered
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vanyacpp at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Consider this code:
namespace a
{
namespace c
{}
struct a
{};
namespace b = a::c; // (1)
using namespace a::c; // (2)
}
Currently GCC prints an error:
file.cpp:9:22: error: 'c' is not a namespace-name
9 | namespace b = a::c;
| ^
file.cpp:10:24: error: 'c' is not a namespace-name
10 | using namespace a::c;
| ^
If I interpret the standard correctly the code should compile without errors
because during the lookup of the qualifier the struct "a" should be ignored and
the namespace "a" should be found.
[basic.lookup.udir]p1: In a using-directive or namespace-alias-definition,
during the lookup for a namespace-name or for a name in a nested-name-specifier
only namespace names are considered.
https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.lookup.udir
https://godbolt.org/z/vaWjx4cKj
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105099] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
@ 2022-03-30 9:35 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 9:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-30 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-03-30
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That wording was clarified by CWG 373:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#373
The issue says that G++ compiles the following:
namespace X {
namespace Y {
struct X {
void f()
{
using namespace X::Y;
namespace Z = X::Y;
}
};
}
}
However, I can't find any version of G++ that accepts it!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105099] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
2022-03-30 9:35 ` [Bug c++/105099] In lookup of " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-30 9:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 12:02 ` [Bug c++/105099] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-30 9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Based on the issue submission date, Clark was probably talking about GCC 3.1 or
similar. So maybe this is a regression since the new C++ parser was introduced.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105099] [9/10/11/12 Regression] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
2022-03-30 9:35 ` [Bug c++/105099] In lookup of " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 9:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-03-30 12:02 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-04 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-03-30 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |10.3.1, 11.2.1, 12.0,
| |4.1.2, 9.4.1
Summary|In lookup of namespace name |[9/10/11/12 Regression] In
|qualifiers only namespaces |lookup of namespace name
|should be considered |qualifiers only namespaces
| |should be considered
Known to work| |3.2.3
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It compiles with GCC 3.2.3, so marking as a regression. My guess is it broke
with the new parser in 3.4 but I haven't confirmed it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105099] [9/10/11/12 Regression] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-30 12:02 ` [Bug c++/105099] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-04-04 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c++/105099] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-04-04 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105099] [10/11/12/13 Regression] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-04-04 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:42 ` [Bug c++/105099] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105099] [10/11/12/13 Regression] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c++/105099] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:42 ` [Bug c++/105099] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/105099] [11/12/13/14 Regression] In lookup of namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105099
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-07 10:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-29 17:24 [Bug c++/105099] New: In lookup for namespace name qualifiers only namespaces should be considered vanyacpp at gmail dot com
2022-03-30 9:35 ` [Bug c++/105099] In lookup of " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 9:38 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-03-30 12:02 ` [Bug c++/105099] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-04-04 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:47 ` [Bug c++/105099] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:42 ` [Bug c++/105099] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).