public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/105309] New: recursive should be the default now, or -fcheck=recursion is incorrect
@ 2022-04-19 15:11 everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
2022-04-19 15:52 ` [Bug fortran/105309] " everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
2022-04-19 15:53 ` everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com @ 2022-04-19 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105309
Bug ID: 105309
Summary: recursive should be the default now, or
-fcheck=recursion is incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
As of F2018, all procedures are recursive by default. However,
`-fcheck=recursion` still identifies procedures called recursively (directly or
indirectly) that do not specify `non_recursive` with `Fortran runtime error:
Recursive call to nonrecursive procedure`. All procedures should be assumed to
have the recursive attribute unless explicitly declared otherwise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/105309] recursive should be the default now, or -fcheck=recursion is incorrect
2022-04-19 15:11 [Bug fortran/105309] New: recursive should be the default now, or -fcheck=recursion is incorrect everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
@ 2022-04-19 15:52 ` everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
2022-04-19 15:53 ` everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com @ 2022-04-19 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105309
--- Comment #1 from Brad Richardson <everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com> ---
After some more searching, I think this is actually a duplicate of 101632. I'll
close this one.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/105309] recursive should be the default now, or -fcheck=recursion is incorrect
2022-04-19 15:11 [Bug fortran/105309] New: recursive should be the default now, or -fcheck=recursion is incorrect everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
2022-04-19 15:52 ` [Bug fortran/105309] " everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
@ 2022-04-19 15:53 ` everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com @ 2022-04-19 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105309
Brad Richardson <everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Brad Richardson <everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com> ---
Duplicate
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 101632 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-19 15:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-19 15:11 [Bug fortran/105309] New: recursive should be the default now, or -fcheck=recursion is incorrect everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
2022-04-19 15:52 ` [Bug fortran/105309] " everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
2022-04-19 15:53 ` everythingfunctional at protonmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).