public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jan at twosigma dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/105344] New: std::source_location::curent() seemingly treated as a pure function in template specializations
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:11:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105344-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105344

            Bug ID: 105344
           Summary: std::source_location::curent() seemingly treated as a
                    pure function in template specializations
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: jan at twosigma dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

When using std::source_location::current().line() in certain contexts on two
different lines, gcc seems to incorrectly think the expression refers to the
same value.

Testcase:

#include <source_location>
#include <utility>

template <int i, class = void> struct foo;

// Two following two specializations are different, yet gcc errors out,
// claiming they are the same.
template <int i>
struct foo<i, std::enable_if_t<i == std::source_location::current().line()>> {
    static constexpr int num = i;
};

template <int i>
struct foo<i, std::enable_if_t<i == std::source_location::current().line()>> {
    static constexpr int num = i;
};

This outputs:

<source>:14:8: error: redefinition of 'struct foo<i, typename std::enable_if<(i
== std::source_location::current().std::source_location::line()), void>::type>'
   14 | struct foo<i, std::enable_if_t<i ==
std::source_location::current().line()>> {
      |       
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<source>:9:8: note: previous definition of 'struct foo<i, typename
std::enable_if<(i ==
std::source_location::current().std::source_location::line()), void>::type>'
    9 | struct foo<i, std::enable_if_t<i ==
std::source_location::current().line()>> {
      |       
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1

https://godbolt.org/z/ozf1MbG3n shows this code works fine under MSVC.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-22 10:11 jan at twosigma dot com [this message]
2022-11-02 20:27 ` [Bug c++/105344] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-105344-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).