public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "reiter.christoph at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/105507] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:14:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-105507-4-KCeGJbeKgc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-105507-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507

--- Comment #9 from Christoph Reiter <reiter.christoph at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8)
> > We currently link:
> > 
> > shared: gmp, winpthread, zlib, zstd
> > static: mpc, mpfr, isl
> > 
> > Not for any particular gcc related reason I think, some dependent packages
> > have static/shared builds, some don't.
> 
> Why didn't I think of that for PR ada/100486?

Sorry, I didn't know this was a problem :) I'm not quite sure how I ended up
maintaining this downstream... but here we are.

> So the fix should have been
> to add -shared-libgcc to GCC_LINKERFLAGS in
> gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-lang.in:
> 
> # Strip -Werror during linking for the LTO bootstrap
> GCC_LINKERFLAGS = $(filter-out -Werror, $(ALL_LINKERFLAGS)) -shared-libgcc
> 
> in your setup since you link gnat1 with shared libraries. This should
> override the -static-libgcc in ALL_LINKERFLAGS inherited from toplevel.
> 
> So you need to to it 1) for GCC 11: rebuild it and reinstall it 2) for GCC
> 12: build it with the patched GCC 11.  Note that this means that GCC 11 is
> currently not fully functional anyway.

Thanks for the detailed instructions. I'll give that a try.

I'm wondering if there are any downsides to just removing "-static-libgcc" from
both "--with-stage1-ldflags" and "--with-boot-ldflags". Or is only ada using
exceptions in GCC?

Or should we try linking everything statically to avoid this alltogether?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-05-19 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06 15:23 [Bug ada/105507] New: " reiter.christoph at gmail dot com
2022-05-17 18:28 ` [Bug ada/105507] " reiter.christoph at gmail dot com
2022-05-18 19:47 ` reiter.christoph at gmail dot com
2022-05-18 20:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-18 21:02 ` reiter.christoph at gmail dot com
2022-05-18 22:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-18 22:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-19  6:40 ` reiter.christoph at gmail dot com
2022-05-19  9:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-19 16:14 ` reiter.christoph at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-05-19 16:55 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-22 15:14 ` reiter.christoph at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-105507-4-KCeGJbeKgc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).