public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug web/106618] New: [docs] Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order`
@ 2022-08-15 7:40 davidfong19 at gmail dot com
2022-08-15 15:59 ` [Bug c++/106618] C++ " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: davidfong19 at gmail dot com @ 2022-08-15 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
Bug ID: 106618
Summary: [docs] Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead
of `-fstrong-eval-order`
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: davidfong19 at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When reading through the [Options
Summary](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Option-Summary.html) page, I
noticed that there was an option in the C++ language section,
`-fargs-in-order=n`, that was not listed in [the dedicated page for C++
language
options](https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html).
I did a quick google and one of the top results was about [a gcc patch which
renamed](https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/txt8uZU1Gq8SB.txt)
the argument to `-fstrong-eval-order`.
I'm guessing it's just a mistake not noticing this documentation which should
be updated?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/106618] C++ Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order`
2022-08-15 7:40 [Bug web/106618] New: [docs] Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order` davidfong19 at gmail dot com
@ 2022-08-15 15:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-16 6:50 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-16 7:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-08-15 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-08-15
Summary|[docs] Option Summary shows |C++ Option Summary shows
|`-fargs-in-order` instead |`-fargs-in-order` instead
|of `-fstrong-eval-order` |of `-fstrong-eval-order`
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Version|unknown |13.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
Something like this:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index fd7edd1938d..fd719b7b2d4 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ in the following sections.
@item C++ Language Options
@xref{C++ Dialect Options,,Options Controlling C++ Dialect}.
@gccoptlist{-fabi-version=@var{n} -fno-access-control @gol
--faligned-new=@var{n} -fargs-in-order=@var{n} -fchar8_t -fcheck-new @gol
+-faligned-new=@var{n} -fchar8_t -fcheck-new @gol
-fconstexpr-depth=@var{n} -fconstexpr-cache-depth=@var{n} @gol
-fconstexpr-loop-limit=@var{n} -fconstexpr-ops-limit=@var{n} @gol
-fno-elide-constructors @gol
@@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ in the following sections.
-flang-info-include-translate@r{[}=@var{header}@r{]} @gol
-flang-info-include-translate-not @gol
-flang-info-module-cmi@r{[}=@var{module}@r{]} @gol
+-fstrong-eval-order @gol
-stdlib=@var{libstdc++,libc++} @gol
-Wabi-tag -Wcatch-value -Wcatch-value=@var{n} @gol
-Wno-class-conversion -Wclass-memaccess @gol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/106618] C++ Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order`
2022-08-15 7:40 [Bug web/106618] New: [docs] Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order` davidfong19 at gmail dot com
2022-08-15 15:59 ` [Bug c++/106618] C++ " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-08-16 6:50 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-16 7:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-08-16 6:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
@Andrew: Can you please commit the fix?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/106618] C++ Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order`
2022-08-15 7:40 [Bug web/106618] New: [docs] Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order` davidfong19 at gmail dot com
2022-08-15 15:59 ` [Bug c++/106618] C++ " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-16 6:50 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-08-16 7:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-08-16 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The option takes optional argument, so perhaps
-fstrong-eval-order -fstrong-eval-order=@var{n} @gol
instead?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-16 7:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-15 7:40 [Bug web/106618] New: [docs] Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead of `-fstrong-eval-order` davidfong19 at gmail dot com
2022-08-15 15:59 ` [Bug c++/106618] C++ " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-16 6:50 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-16 7:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).