public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/106680] Test gcc.target/powerpc/bswap64-4.c fails on 32-bit BE
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 13:24:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106680-4-bW8wRm2AZE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106680-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106680

--- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sebastian Huber from comment #8)
> Yes, it seems that -mcpu=e6500 -mno-powerpc64 yields the right code for the
> attached test case (with or without the -m32).

The default is -m32 I guess? :)

> 
> I am now a bit confused what the purpose of the -m32 and -m64 options is.

For -m32/-m64, the manual says:

Generate code for 32-bit or 64-bit environments of Darwin and SVR4 targets
(including GNU/Linux). The 32-bit environment sets int, long and pointer to 32
bits and generates code that runs on any PowerPC variant. The 64-bit
environment sets int to 32 bits and long and pointer to 64 bits, and generates
code for PowerPC64, as for -mpowerpc64.

But it's possible to interact with option powerpc64, like cpu e6500 which by
default supports powerpc64 and if applied OS is able to support the necessary
context switches, we want -mpowerpc64 kept and it's able to generate more
efficient code (leveraging insns guarded with powerpc64 flag).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-05 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-106680-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-08-29  8:52 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-27 10:14 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-04  5:21 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-20 11:27 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2024-01-20 11:33 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2024-02-05 12:54 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 13:01 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2024-02-05 13:03 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 13:08 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2024-02-05 13:24 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-02-05 13:30 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-05 13:38 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
2024-02-07 14:08 ` sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106680-4-bW8wRm2AZE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).