public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/106948] New: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy
@ 2022-09-15 1:44 jfeng33 at hotmail dot com
2022-09-15 18:44 ` [Bug fortran/106948] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jfeng33 at hotmail dot com @ 2022-09-15 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948
Bug ID: 106948
Summary: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jfeng33 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling the below code failed and gave the following error in which f was
declared to be pure:
22 | x = int(f(real(x)) * 0.1)
| 1
Error: Reference to impure function ‘f’ at (1) within a PURE procedure
module a
implicit none
interface new
pure module subroutine b(x, f)
integer, intent(inout) :: x
interface
pure function f(x) result(r)
real, intent(in) :: x
real :: r
end function f
end interface
end subroutine b
end interface new
end module a
submodule(a) a_b
implicit none
contains
module procedure b
x = int(f(real(x)) * 0.1)
end procedure b
end submodule a_b
program test
use a
implicit none
integer :: x
x = 10
call new(x, g)
print *, x
contains
pure function g(y) result(r)
real, intent(in) :: y
real :: r
r = sqrt(y)
end function g
end program test
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/106948] pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy
2022-09-15 1:44 [Bug fortran/106948] New: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy jfeng33 at hotmail dot com
@ 2022-09-15 18:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-15 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106948
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-15
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed.
Likely a problem due to use of submodules. A simplified, but otherwise
equivalent version, such as below, works:
module a
implicit none
interface new
module procedure :: b
end interface new
contains
subroutine b(x, f)
integer, intent(inout) :: x
interface
pure function f(x) result(r)
real, intent(in) :: x
real :: r
end function f
end interface
x = int(f(real(x)) * 0.1)
end subroutine b
end module a
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-15 18:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-15 1:44 [Bug fortran/106948] New: pure subroutine with pure procedure as dummy jfeng33 at hotmail dot com
2022-09-15 18:44 ` [Bug fortran/106948] " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).