public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/106950] New: Missed PRE full redundancy without post-loop use
@ 2022-09-15 12:45 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-09-22 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106950] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-15 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106950

            Bug ID: 106950
           Summary: Missed PRE full redundancy without post-loop use
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

when we have the situation of PR106922, aka g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr106922.C which is
XFAILed on !lp64 because of this there's

  mem = 0;
  do
    {
       if (mem)
         mem = 0;
       if (mem) // as 'char' instead of 'bool', maybe relevant
         bar ();
       if (i++ != n)
         break;
    }
  while (1);
  .. = mem;

with the use of 'mem' after the loop we get that antic-in in the loop
exit condition block and eventually figure the full redundancy in
the conditional redundant set to zero during PRE insertion.  When that
'mem' after the loop is _not_ there this isn't triggered (possibly
because of the 'char' vs. 'bool' here, but then one can eventually
elide the whole if (mem) bar () code).

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/106950] Missed PRE full redundancy without post-loop use
  2022-09-15 12:45 [Bug tree-optimization/106950] New: Missed PRE full redundancy without post-loop use rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-09-22 11:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-22 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106950

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The very specifc case was addressed now, I don't think it's worth keeping this
open since it also lacks a specific simpler testcase for the PRE issue that
might still exist.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-22 11:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-15 12:45 [Bug tree-optimization/106950] New: Missed PRE full redundancy without post-loop use rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-22 11:12 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106950] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).