[Bug fortran/106987] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in simplify_intrinsic_op, at fortran/expr.cc:1305

["anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106987

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #5)
> Hi Harald,
> 
> I am pinning this one on you since it needs backporting to 13-branch, at
> least. It also keeps the audit trail clean.

Hi Paul,

this one is at the top of my backport list.

It depends on backporting r14-8902 (mine), and has weak conflict if
r14-1629 (yours) is not backported, as testcase gfortran.dg/pr99350.f90
was introduced in that commit.

I could amend backporting the fix for the current PR as well as r14-8902
to 13-branch by removing the changes to pr99350.f90 from the backport.
That is likely the most simple solution, as backporting r14-1629 might
introduce regressions.

Nevertheless, the current fixes can only be backported to 13-branch,
as some of the infrastructure changes for better error recovery after
arithmetic errors and when array ctors are involved are to risky to
backport to 12-branch.

What do you think?