public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107021] [13 Regression] 511.povray_r error with -Ofast -march=znver2 -flto since r13-2810-gb7fd7fb5011106 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 09:17:31 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-107021-4-Mf5Yshr462@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-107021-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107021 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |13.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Btw, make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-march=znver2/-Ofast vect.exp=vect-tsvc-s1281.c" doesn't work to reproduce since the harness appends -O2, but I can reproduce with -Ofast -mavx2 on trunk. value: inf, expected: inf because } else if (!strcmp(name, "s1281")) { return INFINITY; and tatic _Bool is_checksum_same(real_t expected, real_t value) { if (expected == INFINITY) return value == INFINITY; is likely optimized away and we end up in else { real_t fraction = value / expected; return 0.99f <= fraction && fraction <= 1.01f; so I'd call that a testsuite issue. Do we know what goes wrong with povray?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-26 9:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-09-23 20:14 [Bug tree-optimization/107021] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-23 20:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107021] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-23 20:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-26 9:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-09-26 9:54 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-26 10:05 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-26 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-26 10:52 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-26 10:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-30 14:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-18 8:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-02 21:11 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-107021-4-Mf5Yshr462@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).