public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 07:00:27 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-107059-4-ezMA3LzDqa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-107059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #33 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:348e46fa8cba960c23170673bfc0c1b4fb384975 commit r13-3148-g348e46fa8cba960c23170673bfc0c1b4fb384975 Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Date: Fri Oct 7 08:59:05 2022 +0200 fixincludes: Deal also with the _Float128x cases [PR107059] On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 08:19:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > Another case are the following 3 snippets: > # if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || defined __cplusplus > # error "_Float128X supported but no constant suffix" > # else > # define __f128x(x) x##f128x > # endif > ... > # if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || defined __cplusplus > # error "_Float128X supported but no complex type" > # else > # define __CFLOAT128X _Complex _Float128x > # endif > ... > # if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || defined __cplusplus > # error "_Float128x supported but no type" > # endif > but as no target has _Float128x right now and don't see it > coming soon, it isn't a big deal (on the glibc side it is of > course ok to adjust those). This incremental patch deals handles the above 3 cases, so we fixinclude what glibc itself changed too. 2022-10-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR bootstrap/107059 * inclhack.def (glibc_cxx_floatn_5): New. * fixincl.x: Regenerated. * tests/base/bits/floatn.h: Regenerated.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-07 7:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-09-27 16:46 [Bug bootstrap/107059] New: " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 17:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/107059] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 17:28 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 17:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 18:40 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 18:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 18:52 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 19:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 19:20 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 19:59 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 20:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 9:45 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 9:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 10:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 10:59 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 11:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 11:26 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 12:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 13:10 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 17:16 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2022-09-28 18:40 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 18:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 18:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 19:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-28 19:20 ` manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com 2022-09-29 8:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 10:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-29 10:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-03 15:29 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-03 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-07 7:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-07 7:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-10-07 7:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-107059-4-ezMA3LzDqa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).