public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:20:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107059-4-p1jXy73Q6o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107059-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059
--- Comment #27 from Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24)
> (In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #22)
> > Even with the fixincluded headers properly being used, the powerpc64le
> > issue still applies because of the issue I noted in
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-September/142259.html
> > with certain required changes to the powerpc version of bits/floatn.h not
> > being covered by the fixincludes fixes added. You get errors such as:
> >
> > /scratch/jmyers/glibc-bot/build/compilers/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/gcc/gcc/
> > include-fixed/bits/floatn.h:88:9: error: multiple types in one declaration
> > 88 | typedef __float128 _Float128;
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > while building libstdc++. (Whereas other architectures can build GCC OK
> > but then run into failures building glibc that my glibc patch is intended
> > to address.)
>
> Posted patch for this in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/602431.html
for me the x86-64 build remains broken the same way as the ppc64 build.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-27 16:46 [Bug bootstrap/107059] New: " seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 17:10 ` [Bug bootstrap/107059] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 17:28 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 17:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 18:40 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 18:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 18:52 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 19:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 19:20 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 19:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 19:59 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-27 20:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 9:45 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 9:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 10:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 10:59 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 11:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 11:26 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 12:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 13:10 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 17:16 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2022-09-28 18:40 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 18:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 18:57 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 19:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-28 19:20 ` manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com [this message]
2022-09-29 8:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29 10:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-29 10:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 15:29 ` seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-07 7:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-07 7:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-07 7:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-107059-4-p1jXy73Q6o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).