public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jlame646 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107126] GCC accepts invalid out of class definition for destructor with C++17
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 20:10:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107126-4-79ERDJ1kER@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107126-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107126

--- Comment #2 from Jason Liam <jlame646 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> This is rejected with -std=c++20 since
> r11-532-g4b38d56dbac6742b038551a36ec80200313123a1
> and the commit log states that it is intentional to apply it only for C++20
> mode because the DR wasn't against C++17.
> So why do you think otherwise?
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2237
> also states:
> (Note that this resolution is a change for C++20, NOT a defect report
> against C++17 and earlier versions.)

First, you've clearly missed something here because this is not
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#2237 . Note
carefully that the above link that you provided was for declarations of ctors
and dtors inside the class definition itself and not for declarations at
namespace scope. 


Second, i'm already aware that this is rejected by gcc with c++20 as i provided
a demo link https://godbolt.org/z/TYjEzss6q at the first line of my bug report.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-02 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-02 19:11 [Bug c++/107126] New: " jlame646 at gmail dot com
2022-10-02 19:41 ` [Bug c++/107126] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-02 20:10 ` jlame646 at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-10-02 20:34 ` jlame646 at gmail dot com
2022-10-02 20:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03  6:14 ` jlame646 at gmail dot com
2022-10-03  6:40 ` jlame646 at gmail dot com
2022-10-03  9:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-03 14:29 ` [Bug c++/107126] -Wc++20-compat should complain about template-id in out of class definition for destructor jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-01 23:36 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-10 13:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-10 13:45 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107126-4-79ERDJ1kER@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).