public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/107239] New: Coroutine code generation bug
@ 2022-10-12 17:24 dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-12 17:24 ` [Bug libstdc++/107239] " dje at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-12 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107239

            Bug ID: 107239
           Summary: Coroutine code generation bug
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: C++-Coroutine, wrong-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

object duplicated without constructor

problem is at line 592 - lambda in co_await 

https://godbolt.org/z/nz1coM5YP

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug libstdc++/107239] Coroutine code generation bug
  2022-10-12 17:24 [Bug libstdc++/107239] New: Coroutine code generation bug dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-10-12 17:24 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-12 18:16 ` [Bug c++/107239] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-02 11:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-12 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107239

--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://twitter.com/novacisko/status/1580056176040980481

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/107239] Coroutine code generation bug
  2022-10-12 17:24 [Bug libstdc++/107239] New: Coroutine code generation bug dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-12 17:24 ` [Bug libstdc++/107239] " dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-10-12 18:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-11-02 11:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-12 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107239

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 53697
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53697&action=edit
testcase

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/107239] Coroutine code generation bug
  2022-10-12 17:24 [Bug libstdc++/107239] New: Coroutine code generation bug dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-12 17:24 ` [Bug libstdc++/107239] " dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-12 18:16 ` [Bug c++/107239] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-11-02 11:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-11-02 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107239

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-02
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Possibly another dup of PR 98401

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-02 11:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-12 17:24 [Bug libstdc++/107239] New: Coroutine code generation bug dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-12 17:24 ` [Bug libstdc++/107239] " dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-12 18:16 ` [Bug c++/107239] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-02 11:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).