[Bug c/107311] New: New test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails

[Bug c/107311] New: New test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails

[seurer at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311

            Bug ID: 107311
           Summary: New test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

g:3b3083a598ca3f4b6203284e01ed39ab6ff0844f, r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f
make  -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32}'
dg.exp=gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c"
FAIL: gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c (test for excess errors)

This is failing with 32 bits on big endian powerpc64.  64 bits works fine.

spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc/ exceptions_enabled39558.cc -m32
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -S -o exceptions_enabled39558.s
FAIL: gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c:8:47: error:
pointer type mismatch in conditional expression

Author: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 18 14:07:27 2022 +0000

    c: C2x enums wider than int [PR36113]

[Bug c/107311] [13 regression] test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails after r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |testsuite-fail
           Priority|P3                          |P1
   Target Milestone|---                         |13.0

[Bug c/107311] [13 regression] test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails after r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-10-19
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It fails on i686-linux too and I think on all sizeof(int) == sizeof(long)
&& sizeof(long) < sizeof(long long) targets (so all 32-bit?).
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/603846.html

[Bug c/107311] [13 regression] test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails after r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a01eae670600852f78e8df1b88259572f181d42e

commit r13-3385-ga01eae670600852f78e8df1b88259572f181d42e
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Oct 19 18:49:03 2022 +0200

    testsuite: Fix up c2x-enum-1.c for 32-bit arches [PR107311]

    On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 02:57:59PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
    > I think the type checked for e5a should be conditional on __LONG_MAX__ >
    > __INT_MAX__; everything else there should be OK regardless.

    This patch does that.

    2022-10-19  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c/107311
            * gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c (enum e5): Expect e5a type inside of
            enum to be int rather than long if long isn't wider than int.

[Bug c/107311] [13 regression] test case gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c fails after r13-3360-g3b3083a598ca3f

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107311

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.