public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)
@ 2022-10-24  6:00 asolokha at gmx dot com
  2022-10-24  8:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107369] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: asolokha at gmx dot com @ 2022-10-24  6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369

            Bug ID: 107369
           Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error:
                    label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

gcc 13.0.0 20221023 snapshot (g:0e37fd4dc74c1db99cdc7d71ef378e1221253c6f) ICEs
when compiling the following testcase, reduced from
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-assume-3.c, w/ -O1:

void
foo (int x)
{
  if (x == 1)
    goto l1;

  [[gnu::assume (({ l1:; 1; }))]];
}

% aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc-13 -O1 -c bgoph4pp.c
bgoph4pp.c: In function 'foo':
bgoph4pp.c:5:5: error: jump into statement expression
    5 |     goto l1;
      |     ^~~~
bgoph4pp.c:7:21: note: label 'l1' defined here
    7 |   [[gnu::assume (({ l1:; 1; }))]];
      |                     ^~
bgoph4pp.c:2:1: error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2
    2 | foo (int x)
      | ^~~
during GIMPLE pass: cfg
bgoph4pp.c:2:1: internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed
0xa39a8e verify_flow_info()
       
/var/tmp/portage/cross-aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-13.0.0_p20221023/work/gcc-13-20221023/gcc/cfghooks.cc:284
0xf87e34 checking_verify_flow_info
       
/var/tmp/portage/cross-aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-13.0.0_p20221023/work/gcc-13-20221023/gcc/cfghooks.h:214
0xf87e34 cleanup_tree_cfg_noloop
       
/var/tmp/portage/cross-aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-13.0.0_p20221023/work/gcc-13-20221023/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.cc:1161
0xf87e34 cleanup_tree_cfg(unsigned int)
       
/var/tmp/portage/cross-aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-13.0.0_p20221023/work/gcc-13-20221023/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.cc:1212
0xf7d534 execute_build_cfg
       
/var/tmp/portage/cross-aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-13.0.0_p20221023/work/gcc-13-20221023/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:378
0xf7d534 execute
       
/var/tmp/portage/cross-aarch64-linux-gnu/gcc-13.0.0_p20221023/work/gcc-13-20221023/gcc/tree-cfg.cc:412

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/107369] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)
  2022-10-24  6:00 [Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2) asolokha at gmx dot com
@ 2022-10-24  8:04 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-24  8:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-24  8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-10-24

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/107369] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)
  2022-10-24  6:00 [Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2) asolokha at gmx dot com
  2022-10-24  8:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107369] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-10-24  8:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-24 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-24  8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 53766
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53766&action=edit
gcc13-pr107369.patch

Untested fix.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/107369] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)
  2022-10-24  6:00 [Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2) asolokha at gmx dot com
  2022-10-24  8:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107369] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-24  8:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-10-24 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-25  8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-25  8:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-24 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |13.0
           Keywords|                            |error-recovery

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/107369] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)
  2022-10-24  6:00 [Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2) asolokha at gmx dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-24 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-10-25  8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-10-25  8:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-25  8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d888535f7ab80e9b08a633bfd774a923b311cde

commit r13-3478-g7d888535f7ab80e9b08a633bfd774a923b311cde
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 25 10:39:20 2022 +0200

    gimplify: Don't add GIMPLE_ASSUME if errors were seen [PR107369]

    The FEs emit errors about jumps into assume attribute conditions,
    but when we add GIMPLE_ASSUME for the condition which is reachable
    through those jumps, we can run into cfg verification diagnostics.

    Fixed by throwing the IFN_ASSUME away during gimplification if
    seen_error () - like we already do for -O0.  GIMPLE_ASSUME in the
middle-end
    is a pure optimization thing and if errors were reported, the optimizations
    will not be beneficial for anything.

    2022-10-25  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/107369
            * gimplify.cc (gimplify_call_expr): If seen_error, handle complex
            IFN_ASSUME the same as for -O0.

            * gcc.dg/attr-assume-4.c: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume8.C: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/107369] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2)
  2022-10-24  6:00 [Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2) asolokha at gmx dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-10-25  8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-10-25  8:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-10-25  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107369

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-25  8:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-24  6:00 [Bug tree-optimization/107369] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: label 'l1' has incorrect context in bb 2) asolokha at gmx dot com
2022-10-24  8:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107369] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24  8:50 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-24 13:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25  8:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-25  8:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).